Posts Tagged ‘politics’

Blog about Vita Activa: Who Cares for Human Rights Defenders

November 13, 2026

On 10 November 2026 Laura Vidal published a post on “Who Cares for Those Who Care?”Laura Vidal is a Venezuelan researcher in freedom of expression, a digital rights advocate, and an intercultural communication expert:

What follows draws on a conversation with Vita Activa’s founder, Lu Ortiz, and on the organization’s own record of its work: six years of annual reports and blog posts tracing how one helpline grew into a wider argument about care.

The Beginnings

Vita Activa’s actual origin predates Vita Activa itself. Around 2018, Ortiz and researcher Estrella Soria ran Hacks de Vida, a transcontinental study that spoke with feminist and cyberfeminist organizations across Latin America. The findings were consistent everywhere: this work got done without pay, without training, in whatever free time was left—nights, early mornings, vacations. Care, disproportionately carried by women, by people from the global south, by racialized people already navigating complex lives, had been normalized as something owed for free. Ortiz has since described it as the moment she understood the task ahead: dignify the work, pay for it, professionalize it, and bring people together to do it collectively. Hacks de Vida, in her words, is “the mother of Vita.”

Vita Activa itself launched in 2020, in the middle of the pandemic, in what its team calls a year defined by economic, political, and social uncertainty—“un año marcado por ese sentimiento de desazón.” Tejiendo Fuerza, its first initiative, opened confidential, anonymous, community spaces for feminist activists, cyberfeminists, journalists, and freedom of expression defenders in Argentina, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Colombia, Ecuador, and Bolivia. The following year confirmed the crisis wasn’t only medical. The organization notes that in 2021 was defined by mental health cases, the effects of lockdown, isolation, and the loss of work, school, and social life.

By 2022, one of Vita Activa’s own users had put language to the question underlying all of it: quiénes cuidan a las que cuidan, “who cares for those who care?” She wrote that activists, journalists, and human rights defenders put their bodies on the line in feminist and intersectional struggle every single day. Meeting Vita Activa felt like recognizing a companion because in an environment this hostile, we have to find each other to persist. The answer the community built for itself was collective, not delivered from outside: nos cuidamos entre nosotras y nosotres, “we care for each other.” It’s why Persistir y Resurgir “Persist and Resist,” carries a political meaning in the plural. By scale, this meant more than 300 people were reached daily through community circles that year.

Growth That Didn’t Outgrow the Collective

Without losing its communal core, what began as a focused helpline grew from the 6 original countries in 2020 to 20 by 2023—with the largest share of cases coming from Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, and El Salvador. The expansion wasn’t only geographic; it was a shift from listening to producing knowledge that could travel on its own. In 2024, the organization launched its first podcast, VitaCast, and produced the Manual de Primeros Auxilios Psicológicos y Digitales, the product of 10 months of free training offered in English, Spanish, and Arabic. That same instinct carried the work beyond its founding region entirely: in late 2023, Vita Activa began offering psychological and digital first aid training to women and LGBTQ+ people, journalists, and activists in the Middle East. This was not aid moving in one direction, but a dialogue between communities of the global majority navigating comparable pressures.

Who was actually arriving, and why, became clearest in the organization’s 2023 Germinar report, which stated that the correspondents were overwhelmingly cisgender women (91.2%), 40% of them journalists, just over half under 30 — reaching out over chronic exhaustion, online harassment, nonconsensual sharing of intimate images, and digital surveillance.

Rest as a Political Practice

Vita Activa closed out 2025 with an idea that folds its philosophy into a single practice: caring for others also means learning to rest. Vita’s executive director was inspired by a line from US poet Tricia Hersey, “Dreaming is our work, rest is the goal.” With that purpose in mind, she initiated Media Fest for team. Thirteen people joined from around the world for a deliberately unhurried day built around a collective collage exercise. Its centerpiece was, quite deliberately, an exercise in producing nothing at all: a guided 30-minute nap, described internally as a profoundly political act of resistance. What surfaced afterward the need for a shared bank of resources, the recommitment to circles, rest, tenderness, the body—and that confirmed something the team had been learning: collective care isn’t peripheral to this work. It’s what makes the work possible to sustain.

If there’s one thing this history argues for, it is care in more than one direction. It is the idea that those who care are cared for and that those who care for the carers are cared for too. That we keep widening the networks, the tools, and the spaces built for this, until our movements build care into their structure rather than reaching for it only after the damage is done.

If you or anyone you know need help, you can contact vita-activa.org.

https://kettering.org/who-cares-for-those-who-care

Frontline calls for action on case of Lina Attalah in Egypt

November 12, 2026

On 11 November 2026, woman human rights defender and journalist, Lina Attalah, is due to appear before the New Cairo Misdemeanor Court in appeal proceedings concerning a 2024 in absentia conviction, where she was sentenced to one year in prison. She was convicted on charges of disseminating false information and operating a website without a licence. These charges had arisen from her legitimate journalistic work.

Lina Attalah is an Egyptian woman human rights defender, journalist and co-founder and editor-in-chief of Mada Masr, an independent bilingual news outlet established in Cairo in 2013. She is a prominent advocate for independent journalism and press freedom in Egypt. Lina Attalah previously served as managing editor of the Egypt Independent and has reported extensively on political, social and human rights issues across Egypt and the wider Middle East. Her journalism has addressed sensitive issues including state accountability, immigration, conflict and freedom of expression.

Lina Attalah has received international recognition for her work, including the 2020 Knight International Journalism Award from the International Center for Journalists. She was also named among TIME magazine’s 100 most influential people in 2020. As a result of her human rights and journalistic work, the woman human rights defender has faced persistent judicial harassment and intimidation.

Meet Lina Attalah

Front Line Defenders

https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/case/lina-attalah-risk-imprisonment-amid-escalating-judicial-harassment

latest

https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/case/trial-woman-human-rights-defender-and-journalist-lina-attalah-postponed-until-18-november

NGOS call on authorities of Thailand to end the judicial harassment of lawyer Arnon Nampa

November 12, 2026

Lawyers for Lawyers (L4L), the International Bar Association Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI), The Law Society of England and Wales (LSEW) and the International Observatory for Lawyers at Risk (OIAD) condemn the latest conviction of Thai human rights lawyer Arnon Nampa under Section 112 (lèse-majesté) of the Thai Criminal Code. On 30 October 2026, Mr. Nampa was sentenced to four years in prison, subsequently reduced to two years and eight months, for speeches delivered during a peaceful assembly. This marks his twelfth conviction under the controversial lèse-majesté law, bringing his cumulative prison sentence to 34 years, five months and 20 days. Mr. Nampa has been detained since 26 September 2023.

Background: Arnon Nampa and the prosecutions against him

Arnon Nampa is a prominent Thai human rights lawyer and a founding member of Thai Lawyers for Human Rights (TLHR) who has dedicated himself to defending individuals charged under the lèse-majesté law, despite facing sustained harassment by state authorities as a result of his work. In addition to his legal practice, Mr. Nampa has participated in public discussions concerning constitutional reform, democracy, and the role of the monarchy. He received the Front Line Defenders Award for Human Rights Defenders at Risk in 2025, and the Gwangju Prize for Human Rights in 2021 in recognition of his efforts to challenge the violent crackdown on protesters during Thailand’s political unrest. His public advocacy during Thailand’s 2020–2021 pro-democracy movement has resulted in numerous criminal proceedings, primarily under the controversial lèse-majesté law, which makes criticism of the monarchy punishable by up to 15 years in prison, equivalent to the penalty for manslaughter.

https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/profile/arnon-nampa

Between 2020 and 2022, authorities arrested and detained Mr. Nampa several times in different cases. He has faced 14 separate lèse-majesté cases and has been convicted in 12 of them. In addition to the criminal proceedings, Mr. Nampa has also been subjected to disbarment proceedings before the Lawyer Council of Thailand under the Royal Patronage, which seek the revocation of his license to practice law in connection with a speech delivered during the protest on 3 August 2020. The proceedings, arising from Mr. Nampa’s exercise of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, have remained pending for more than five years and are currently under consideration by the Lawyer Council’s Professional Etiquette Committee.

Judicial harassment and misuse of Section 112

Mr. Nampa’s prosecution forms part of a broader pattern of judicial harassment and criminal proceedings against lawyers, human rights defenders, journalists and pro-democracy activists under Section 112 of the Thai Criminal Code. The broad interpretation and application of this provision have enabled the criminalisation of peaceful expression concerning the monarchy, severely restricting freedom of expression and public debate while exposing individuals to lengthy prison sentences for exercising their fundamental rights. UN human rights experts have repeatedly called on Thailand to repeal its lèse-majesté laws, raising serious concerns about their incompatibility with international human rights standards.

The repeated prosecutions of Mr. Nampa, the accumulation of lengthy prison sentences and the persistent denial of bail raise serious concerns that criminal proceedings are being used to punish and deter legitimate human rights advocacy and peaceful political expression. The prosecution and imprisonment of a human rights lawyer for participating in public debate not only violate his fundamental rights but also undermine the independence of the legal profession. Such measures risk creating a chilling effect on other lawyers, discouraging them from engaging in human rights advocacy, representing individuals in politically sensitive cases or speaking out on matters of public interest.

These concerns are further reinforced by the findings of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD). In its Opinion No. 28/2024 concerning Arnon Nampa, adopted during its 100th session in August 2024, the Working Group concluded that his deprivation of liberty was arbitrary and in violation of Thailand’s obligations under international human rights law. Notably, the Working Group found that Mr. Nampa had been “deprived of his liberty on discriminatory grounds on the basis of his political or other opinion regarding the lèse-majesté law”. It therefore called on the Thai authorities to release him immediately and grant him an enforceable right to compensation and other reparations, in accordance with international law. Despite these findings and recommendations, Mr. Nampa remains imprisoned and continues to face further convictions under Section 112.

Exclusion of Section 112 in Thailand’s recently enacted amnesty law

In August 2026, Thailand enacted a law that provides amnesty to individuals charged, prosecuted, and convicted in connection with political expression and/or public assemblies between 2005 and 2025. However, the law explicitly excludes offenses under Section 112. Since November 2020, close to 300 people have been charged and/or prosecuted under Section 112, including 20 children. Among them are Mr. Nampa and at least 32 other political prisoners who are currently detained in prison.

The undersigned organisations call on the authorities of Thailand to

  1. Immediately and unconditionally release Mr. Nampa, in accordance with the findings and recommendations of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention in Opinion No. 28/2024, and ensure his right to adequate compensation and other reparations;
  2. Put an end to all forms of judicial harassment against Mr. Nampa, including criminal and disciplinary proceedings arising from the legitimate exercise of his rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, and ensure that he is not subjected to further reprisals for his work as a lawyer;
  3. Guarantee Mr. Nampa’s physical and psychological integrity, as well as his access to adequate medical care and legal counsel, for as long as he remains in detention;
  4. Repeal or amend Section 112 of the Thai Criminal Code to bring Thailand’s legal framework into full compliance with its international human rights obligations, particularly the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly under the ICCPR, and ensure that criminal legislation is not used to suppress peaceful dissent or legitimate human rights advocacy;
  5. Amend the amnesty law to include offenses under Section 112 of the Criminal Code in the amnesty;
  6. Ensure that all lawyers in Thailand can carry out their professional activities freely, independently and without fear of intimidation, harassment or reprisals, including when representing clients in politically sensitive cases or participating in public debate, in accordance with the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers.

Signatories

Lawyers for Lawyers (L4L)
International Bar Association Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI)
The Law Society of England and Wales (LSEW)
International Observatory for Lawyers at Risk (OIAD)

Write for Rights 2026 Activist Toolkit

November 9, 2026

On 4 November 2026 Amnesty International’s Write for Rights letter-writing kit was published. Here you will find everything you need to successfully take part in the Write for Rights 2026 campaign. Write for Rights changes lives and your words matter.

The people featured in this year’s campaign are from all around the world, like Owen Chow jailed in Hong Kong simply for standing up for democracy, and Rokiatou Doumbia in Mali, detained for daring to ask why food was too expensive on TikTok.

A letter can change someone’s life. That’s the idea behind Write for Rights, our global letter-writing campaign. In 2001, a small group of activists in Poland decided to run a 24-hour letter-writing marathon for 10 December – Human Rights Day. The idea took off and this year marks the 25th anniversary of people taking over 50 million actions against injustice, writing letters and signing petitions in support of people whose human rights have been denied.[https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2026/10/24/write-for-rights-campaign-turns-25-here-7-successes/]

How does Write for Rights work?

2026 Cases

Right now, all around the world, human rights are under attack. This year we’re taking action for individuals and communities from around the world, who are courageously speaking truth to power.

You can check out videos of all the cases here.

For all the cases, in one printable PDF, see our Helpful Resources


TUNISIA: Ayachi Hammami is a Tunisian human rights lawyer imprisoned after a sham terrorism related trial linked to his defence of judges, lawyers, journalists, activists and opposition figures. Ayachi has spent decades fighting for justice and human rights in the country. His imprisonment reflects Tunisia’s growing crackdown on peaceful dissent and misuse of the justice system to silence critics.


RUSSIA: Daria Egereva is an Indigenous rights defender from Russia facing up to 20 years in prison for peaceful activism. A climate justice advocate and proud member of the Selkup People, she has dedicated her life to protecting Indigenous lands, languages and cultures. Despite threats and detention, Daria has remained courageous and committed to defending the rights of her people.[https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2026/11/02/portraits-break-the-silence-over-the-cost-of-defending-nature/]


TANZANIA: Former ambassador Humphrey Polepole was abducted at his home in Dar es Salaam on 6 October 2025. He has not been seen since. Humphrey appears to have been targeted because of his criticism of the president and ruling party for restrictions on civic space, crackdowns on human rights, and attacks on opposition members. His family miss him dearly, and need answers.


PAKISTAN: Human rights lawyers and married couple Imaan Mazari-Hazir (right) and Hadi Ali Chatth (left) have dedicated their careers to representing victims of state oppression, despite threats and harassment by the authorities. In January 2026, they were given long prison sentences for their posts on sochttps://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2026/01/27/human-rights-lawyers-couple-imaan-mazari-and-hadi-ali-chattha-sentenced-to-jail-in-pakistan/ial media expressing solidarity with Baloch and Pashtun activists and criticizing the Pakistan military.


EGYPT: Marwa Arafa is an Egyptian human rights activist arbitrarily detained for over six years because of her peaceful activism supporting detained children and their families. Arrested in front of her young daughter, she faces unfounded terrorism-related charges which can carry life imprisonment. Her case is part of a wider effort to silence peaceful dissent in Egypt.


HONG KONG: Owen Chow joined his first pro-democracy protest at just 15 years old. He later became one of the “HK47” – a group of activists and politicians prosecuted under Hong Kong’s draconian National Security Law for their political participation.

Owen should be doing the things he loves like photography, hiking and travelling. Instead, he faces more than 12 years in prison for hoping to serve the underprivileged and build a fairer society.


MALI: Rokiatou Doumbia is a businesswoman, activist and social media influencer from Mali who remains in detention after criticizing rising living costs and the failures of Mali’s military authorities during a TikTok livestream. A mother of two and a supporter of women in her community, she has dedicated her life to helping others. Instead of being protected for speaking out, she became a target.


EL SALVADOR: Ruth López is a lawyer and human rights defender who spent years speaking out against corruption and injustices in El Salvador.In May 2025, Ruth was arrested at her home and locked up. One year later she is still in detention, without regular access to her family or lawyer. Her story is an example of the criminal legal system being used as a weapon to silence critical voices.https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2026/05/19/alarm-over-yearlong-detention-of-woman-human-rights-defender-ruth-lopez-in-el-salvador/


Rainbow case

Alongside the cases, above, Amnesty International Australia has included another action that we think will be of interest to people taking part in Write for Rights 2026, wanting to take powerful written actions for human rights and justice.


TÜRKIYE: Over 100 LGBTI Rights Defenders, including board and oversight committee members of Türkiye’s foremost LGBTI rights organization KAOS GL, Janset Kalan, Nedime Erdoğan, Umut Derin and Selin Berghan, and journalist, Tuğba Tekerek, have been detained in a wave of police operations targeting Türkiye’s LGBTI people, organizations, and allies since 12 September 2026.


https://www.amnesty.org.au/write-for-rights-2026-activist-toolkit

Apply now for CIVICUS Human Rights Internship 2027 in Geneva

November 9, 2026

The CIVICUS Human Rights Internship 2027 presents an opportunity for emerging human rights professionals, international relations graduates and aspiring civil society advocates to gain practical experience supporting global human rights advocacy at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland.

CIVICUS Global Alliance, an international organisation dedicated to defending civic freedoms and strengthening civil society participation, is seeking a motivated Human Rights Intern to support its UN advocacy priorities, human rights research, member engagement and international policy activities.

Based in Europe, this internship offers an opportunity to contribute to meaningful human rights initiatives while gaining exposure to international advocacy processes, UN human rights mechanisms and the work of civil society organisations operating across different regions.

Applications close on 15 November 2026, making this an important opportunity for qualified candidates interested in developing careers in international human rights, diplomacy, public policy and civil society advocacy.

The selected Human Rights Intern will work under the supervision of the UN Advisor and UN Advocacy and Network Officer, supporting the implementation of CIVICUS’s advocacy priorities at the United Nations in Geneva.The position combines human rights research, international advocacy, stakeholder engagement, communications and administrative support.

The opportunity is intended for candidates with an academic background and demonstrated interest in international human rights, international relations, law, politics or related social sciences.

US’s UN advocacy work in Geneva, Switzerland.

The successful candidate is expected to commence the position in mid-January 2027 or on 1 February 2027.

Interviews are scheduled to take place in December 2026.

APPLY HERE NOW

Portraits break the silence over the cost of defending nature

November 2, 2026
Logo

Portraits break the silence over the cost of defending nature
Indigenous activists and civil society representatives carry portraits of killed, missing and imprisoned environmental defenders during a silent procession at the COP17 UN Biodiversity Conference in Yerevan, Armenia, on 29 October 2026, calling for justice and protection for those defending nature. Photo: Sohanur Rahman /The Climate Watch

Sohanur Rahman

Sohanur Rahman

OnNovember 1, 2026

The silent procession highlighted the risks faced by environmental defenders worldwide, urging governments to turn biodiversity commitments into meaningful protection for Indigenous peoples and local communities. At COP17 in Armenia, a quiet procession brought the faces of killed, missing and imprisoned environmental defenders into the global biodiversity talksIn the hands of marchers, photographs carried the faces of people who could not be there.

Some had been killed. Others had disappeared. Others remained in prison.

Among the photographs were those of Daria Egereva and Natalia Leongardt, who are imprisoned in Russia, according to the campaign supporting them. Participants carried their portraits alongside those of other defenders killed, missing or imprisoned because of their work, the campaign’s account said.

The procession combined remembrance with solidarity. It drew attention to the gap between international commitments to protect environmental defenders and the persecution many continue to face.

Indigenous peoples’ rights were central to the action. Placards highlighted the importance of free, prior and informed consent in decisions affecting their territories, connecting the protection of ecosystems with communities’ rights over their lands and futures.

Global Witness documented the killing of at least 124 land and environmental defenders in 2025. Its records include 2,375 killings and disappearances since 2012, although reporting and verification gaps mean the true toll is likely higher. [see https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2026/09/21/new-global-witness-figures-at-least-124-land-and-environmental-defenders-killed-globally-in-2025/]

Target 22 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework calls for the full protection of environmental human rights defenders. It also requires inclusive participation in biodiversity decisions, access to justice and information, and respect for Indigenous peoples’ and local communities’ rights over their lands, territories, resources and traditional knowledge.

Guidance from the Convention on Biological Diversity identifies legal protection, effective remedies and freedom from retaliation as practical measures to safeguard defenders.

In Yerevan, the photographs gave those commitments a human face. The procession called attention to the distance between promises made in international forums and the safety of people defending nature on the ground. For those remembered in the portraits, protection had come too late or remained out of reach. The action urged governments to make their commitments effective for those still facing danger.

Human Rights Defenders want to strengthen redress for victims in Africa

October 26, 2026
Group photo 9Sep

On 9-10 September 2026 the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) gathered legal practitioners, civil society representatives, and victim advocates from across anglophone Africa in Johannesburg, to consider means of strengthening access to justice in non-criminal processes.

The regional consultation was convened as part of a wider global initiative to elaborate guidance for human rights advocates in efforts to secure effective redress for gross human rights violations and abuses and serious violations of international humanitarian law. The consultation focused on strengthening non-criminal justice pathways, including  through judicial and administrative processes, customary and traditional legal systems, and strategic civil litigation. 

“Alongside criminal pathways a wide spectrum of non-criminal justice processes which are civil, administrative, traditional and hybrid have developed within national and regional systems. These mechanisms can deliver outcomes that criminal trials alone cannot deliver, such as restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-occurrence.” said Kaajal Ramjathan-Keogh, ICJ Africa Regional Programme Director. 

Participants addressed persistent gaps between official legal recognition of harm and actual delivery to survivors, noting how administrative reparation awards and truth commission recommendations, such as in South Africa, The Gambia, and Kenya, routinely stall due to such factors as political inertia and administrative bottlenecks. Practitioners mapped strategies to close these accountability deficient gaps, including record-building efforts that harmonize narrative truth-seeking with the strict evidentiary standards and archive disclosure rules required by domestic and regional courts. 

Participants also examined the interface of customary and traditional justice systems, such as those in South Sudan and Rwanda, which were purported to operate on principles of restorative harmony and local reconciliation, while stressing the need for adherence to human rights norms around gender equality and conditional amnesties.

In contexts of severe civic space closure or systemic State immunity, litigators explored extraterritorial jurisdictions and sub-regional courts like the East African Court of Justice (EACJ) and ECOWAS Community Court of Justice to bypass domestic blockades…

“On top of striving to adopt a more victim-oriented approach in the criminal justice system, non-criminal justice avenues at local, regional, and international levels must be explored, reassessed, and strengthened with a view to implementing the rule of law effectively” stated Justice Aruna Devi Narain, ICJ Commissioner and Judge of the Supreme Court of Mauritius. 

The Johannesburg gathering represents the third stage of the ICJ’s multi-year initiative on non-criminal justice mechanisms, following global and regional forums in Geneva (November 2025) and Bogotá (June 2026) The insights gathered in Johannesburg will feed directly into the ICJ’s elaboration of practical global guidance for jurists, litigators, and policymakers on designing and implementing non-criminal justice mechanisms.

The initiative is supported by the Republic and Canton of Geneva. 

Nice example of student HRDs at work: Berkeley

October 24, 2026
woman speaking at a podium
Kate Reeves describes her wide-ranging work in Peru, which included mapping illegal mining sites and helping local communities monitor deforestation. Photo by Maggie Andresen

Each fall, Berkeley Law’s Human Rights Center hosts an afternoon event where student fellows give presentations about their recent fieldwork. Using compelling visuals to help amplify what are often little-known threats to human rights across the world, they share insights about their work while illuminating vital issues, conflicts, and advocacy efforts.

Three Berkeley Law students — Sonali Dhawan, Kate Reeves, and Sam Klein-Markman — are among this year’s dozen fellows. Each emphasized how their summer work powerfully fueled motivation to use their growing legal skills for advancing social justice.

Working with Thai Lawyers for Human Rights to end the imprisonment and harassment of dissidents, Dhawan monitored legal proceedings against political prisoners, produced trial reports for diplomats, and prepared comprehensive recommendations on Thailand’s draft legislation regarding strategic lawsuits against public participation.

The organization’s co-founder, Arnon Nampa, is one of 48 known political prisoners in Thailand. Imprisoned for over three years as a result of his peaceful pro-democracy activism, his cumulative sentences extend past 31 years following additional court rulings. When Nampa co-founded Thai Lawyers for Human Rights after Thailand’s 2014 coup, the organization offered free legal assistance to hundreds of dissidents harassed by the military.

“Thailand’s royal defamation law criminalizes criticism of the monarchy,” Dhawan explained. “It carries sentences of three to 15 years, which is equivalent to manslaughter. Thai citizens and foreigners are unjustly prosecuted for freedom of expression and association.”…

Reeves worked for La Federación Nativa del Río Madre de Dios y Afluentes (FENAMAD), a regional Indigenous organization in the Peruvian Amazon that defends the rights of Indigenous peoples and Native communities. The organization represents 38 such communities across the Madre de Dios River basin, a major tributary for the Amazon River in southeastern Peru. Supporting the implementation of a project to protect territorial rights, fight illegal deforestation, and safeguard environmental defenders, Reeves visited numerous communities impacted by threats posing significant risks in the area — including illegal gold mining, narco-trafficking, and illegal logging.

….

Klein-Markman supported Proyecto de Derechos Económicos (ProDESC) in helping Indigenous communities organize and bring legal claims against internationally financed development projects.

This work included helping draft a complaint against Norway’s state-owned energy company Statkraft, on behalf of Mapuche-Williche communities in Chile, for a hydropower dam project in their sacred territory. “The problem with green development is that its benefits are concentrated in the Global North — with severe costs in the Global South,” he said. “These costs are further concentrated in poor rural areas, with local environmental harms, threats of violence, loss of cultural practices, and financial incentive to silence local dissent.”

ProDESC’s work in Chile resulted in filing a claim in a Norwegian court that Statkraft’s actions violated the Mapuche community’s human rights, including flooding both a site of current cultural practices and a past burial site. The organization helped apply public pressure aimed at making the project untenable in Norway, forming alliances with Norwegian Indigenous groups and building a record of harms and violations.

https://www.law.berkeley.edu/article/difference-makers-human-rights-center-student-fellows-help-protect-vulnerable-communities-worldwide

ICC wins EU Parliament’s human rights prize 2026

October 22, 2026

The 2026 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought is collectively awarded to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its officials.

Announcing the 2026 laureate in the hemicycle on Thursday, European Parliament President Roberta Metsola declared: “The European Union is built on respect for multilateralism and international institutions. With the award of the Sakharov prize to the International Criminal Court and its officials, the European Parliament recognises the Court’s important work in upholding international law and justice.”

The International Criminal Court (ICC) investigates and, where warranted, tries individuals charged with the gravest crimes of concern to the international community: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.

The Court is a crucial actor in the global fight to end impunity, and through international criminal justice, it aims to hold those responsible accountable for their crimes and to help prevent these crimes from happening again. As a court of last resort, it seeks to complement national courts. Governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, the ICC is the world’s first permanent international criminal court.

The award highlights the ICC’s work, including investigations, prosecutions, trials and the issuance or authorisation of arrest warrants. See also: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2026/08/13/four-us-human-rights-groups-sue-trump-administration-over-crippling-icc-sanctions/

In Parliament’s 2025 annual reports on the implementation of the common Foreign and Security Policy and on the human rights and democracy in the world, MEPs expressed their deep concern at the growing threats and the various waves of sanctions imposed since 2025 on the ICC, notably by the USA, as well as on its prosecutors, judges, staff and partners, considering these to be serious attacks on the international justice system.

MEPs have repeatedly called on the European Commission to activate the EU’s so-called ‘blocking statute’ to protect officials working at the ICC from extraterritorial attacks, and to enable it to continue its activities in complete independence. The blocking statute protects European operators, regardless of their size or sector of activity, by nullifying within the EU the effect of any foreign judicial decision based on foreign laws, also enabling them to seek compensation in court for damages caused by the extraterritorial application of foreign laws.

For more on this award, see: https://trueheroesfilms.com/equip/digest/?sort=most&laureate=13a10c16-6014-4132-8ed7-c4af3b1ef2a8

A newspaper wondered why the news attracted little attention in the British press, despite the award’s significance [https://leftfootforward.org/2026/10/right-called-out-after-echr-wins-prestigious-award-but-where-was-the-media-coverage/]. But I think there was quie bit worldwide, see e.g.:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/eu-sakharov-prize-icc-9.7391471

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/22/us-sanctioned-icc-wins-sakharov-prize-eus-top-human-rights-award

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20261018IPR48263/the-international-criminal-court-and-its-officials-awarded-the-sakharov-prize

https://www.politico.eu/article/icc-wins-eu-parliaments-human-rights-prize

https://1lurer.am/en/news/1588229

UN Third Committee Hears that Human Rights Defenders face growing repression

October 21, 2026
United Nations

Enforced disappearances are reaching alarming levels worldwide, while human rights defenders face increasing persecution and surveillance, United Nations experts warned the Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural) on 20 October 2026 citing thousands of unresolved cases and growing threats to those seeking justice and accountability.

Andrea Bolaños Vargas, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, warned that criminalization has become the most prevalent global threat facing those who expose abuses and defend fundamental freedoms. Presenting findings from a survey of 1,122 respondents, she reported that 66 per cent of women human rights defenders believed their situation had deteriorated, rising to 78 per cent among LGBTIQ+ women defenders. Three quarters said restrictive laws and regulations had undermined their work.

“Criminalization is combined with disinformation and stigmatization, surveillance, arbitrary detention, administrative restrictions, funding restrictions, digital attacks, and in some cases, violence against defenders themselves, as well as their families,” she said. Such threats extend even to regions with long-standing democratic traditions. “The human cost is enormous,” she stressed, reporting that 83 per cent of survey respondents experienced negative effects on their mental health. Nearly half of the women human rights defenders surveyed reported having to leave their homes to seek safety, with 24 per cent internally displaced and 22 per cent forced into exile.

Even exile offers no guarantee of protection, she warned, citing surveillance, attacks against relatives, deprivation of nationality and other forms of transnational oppression. “Protection alone is not enough,” she declared, adding: “The aspiration must be that no one has to risk their safety, freedom or life to defend human rights.” [see e.g. https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2026/09/28/over-130-human-rights-experts-issue-global-call-for-states-to-end-transnational-repression/]

Delegates Clash over Imprisoned Activists

…The Czech Republic’s representative highlighted the imprisonment of human rights defenders in Belarus and the Russian Federation, drawing attention to Ukrainian activists Iryna Danylovych and Amet Suleymanov, held in Russian Federations prisons without adequate medical care.

Germany’s delegate urged Moscow to release two Indigenous human rights defenders and called on China to free Hong Kong lawyer Chow Hang Tung.

Rejecting the criticism, China’s representative accused Germany of spreading “smears”. “Some countries and political forces seek to portray criminals as human rights defenders to whitewash their unlawful and criminal conduct,” he said.

Belarus’s delegate dismissed the Czech Republic’s allegations concerning medical care for detainees, insisting that free healthcare is available to all, including prisoners. The Russian Federation’s representative, meanwhile, accused Ukraine and the Baltic States of persecuting those defending Russian-speaking populations, citing the arrest of Latvian activist Viktor Gushchin.

The European Union’s representative, speaking in its capacity as observer, warned that growing fear and self-censorship among people cooperating with United Nations human rights mechanisms represents “a substantive loss to us all”, expressing concern over technology-facilitated transnational repression….

https://press.un.org/en/2026/gashc4446.doc.htm