Archive for the 'human rights' Category

A Guide to Supercharging HRD Movement with Artificial Intelligence

November 4, 2026
Human Rights Foundation

The HRF announced on 22 September 2026 a new guide to understand AI and how to use it safely to defend freedom

Artificial intelligence (AI) is often described as the most transformative technology of our time. Its meteoric development is reshaping industries, economies, and the way people work, communicate, and create. Governments are investing billions of dollars into it. Corporations are racing to build ever more capable AI systems. News headlines alternate between promises of extraordinary breakthroughs and warnings about existential risks.

For activists, journalists, researchers, and civil society organizations, however, the question is much simpler: What does AI mean for the work I do every day

The reality is that authoritarian regimes are already using AI to expand surveillance, censorship, and social control. At the same time, activists are using it to research faster, build new tools, and amplify their impact. AI itself is neither democratic nor authoritarian. Like any powerful tool, its impact depends on who controls it and how it is used.

Gene Sharp, the author of the book “From Dictatorship to Democracy” and the world’s foremost scholar of nonviolent revolution, spent decades documenting that even the most entrenched authoritarian regimes depend on the consent and cooperation of their subjects, and that organized, disciplined resistance can withdraw that consent. AI doesn’t change that logic, but it does change the scale and speed at which activists can act on it.

That is what this guide is about: Helping dissidents understand AI and how to use it safely to defend freedom, and bringing them to realize that they do not need a technical background to follow along.

This guide is specially written for people working to strengthen democracy, defend human rights, and build more open societies while living and working under authoritarian regimes. It focuses on the practical applications of AI rather than the technical details behind it. You will learn how to use AI chat tools, build applications without hiring a software developer, create personal AI agents, protect your privacy, and automate parts of your work. The emphasis throughout is on practical skills you can begin using right away.

And no, you do not need to learn how to code, understand machine learning, or become a technology expert. You don’t need to know any of these things to use the internet, and the same applies here. What you do need is time to experiment and understand what these tools can do, where their risks lie, and how to use them safely and effectively.

That said, no guide can keep pace with a technology that evolves this quickly. New models and tools will be released. Some of the examples in these pages will eventually become outdated (we will do our best to keep this guide updated). But the underlying lessons will remain the same. AI is becoming a source of leverage in the struggle for freedom in fully and hybrid authoritarian countries in every corner of the world, including, for example, Venezuela, Russia, India or Thailand. Understanding how to use it well will increasingly be a prerequisite for effective advocacy in the years to come.

Please note that this resource is not meant to convince you that AI is the answer to every problem. It is not. Human rights work will always depend on courage, judgment, trust, and human relationships. No algorithm can replace those things. But AI can help the people who possess them work faster, reach further, and achieve more.

There is also a lesson worth remembering. When social media emerged, activists and developers alike were slow to grasp how dictators would exploit it, and that delay came at a real cost to the safety and privacy of activists and pro-democracy movements. We cannot afford to repeat that mistake.

As AI reshapes the world, those defending freedom need to be early, not late, in understanding its strengths, its risks, and how to use it well. Activists, especially ones working in a high-risk environment, should treat AI as a core tool, not an adjacent one, and devote real time to understanding it.

Civil liberties advocates should help shape the AI future, not simply follow into a future designed by others who don’t share the same concerns.

We hope this guide gives you the knowledge, confidence, and practical tools to do exactly that

New Study highlights ways forward for more justice for Victims of International Crimes

November 3, 2026
  • 16 September 2026

Effective accountability for international crimes often depends on strong cooperation between civil society organisations and national authorities. A new report published today explores how that cooperation can be strengthened to better support investigations, prosecutions and access to justice for victims and survivors.

Building trust between civil society organisations and prosecuting authorities is essential for advancing accountability for war crimes, crimes against humanity and other serious human rights violations.

A new report published today within the Global Initiative Against Impunity (GIAI) examines how cooperation between civil society organisations and domestic authorities can be strengthened to better support investigations and prosecutions of international crimes. The study identifies both successful practices and persistent challenges, and offers practical recommendations to improve collaboration in the pursuit of justice.

Drawing on 74 interviews with more than 100 participants across 12 jurisdictions, the report brings together the experiences of civil society organisations, legal practitioners, investigators and prosecutors working on accountability for international crimes.

Among its findings, the report highlights the importance of trust, transparency, long-term engagement and adequate support for victims and witnesses. It also presents recommendations aimed at strengthening dialogue, sharing expertise and improving legal and institutional frameworks.

The report was developed by TRIAL International together with Civil Rights Defenders, ECCHR, FIDH and REDRESS, and is intended as a resource for practitioners working to advance accountability for international crimes.

Read the report: 2026_Reinforcing Trust to Advance Accountability for International Crimes.

Human Rights Defenders want to strengthen redress for victims in Africa

October 26, 2026
Group photo 9Sep

On 9-10 September 2026 the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) gathered legal practitioners, civil society representatives, and victim advocates from across anglophone Africa in Johannesburg, to consider means of strengthening access to justice in non-criminal processes.

The regional consultation was convened as part of a wider global initiative to elaborate guidance for human rights advocates in efforts to secure effective redress for gross human rights violations and abuses and serious violations of international humanitarian law. The consultation focused on strengthening non-criminal justice pathways, including  through judicial and administrative processes, customary and traditional legal systems, and strategic civil litigation. 

“Alongside criminal pathways a wide spectrum of non-criminal justice processes which are civil, administrative, traditional and hybrid have developed within national and regional systems. These mechanisms can deliver outcomes that criminal trials alone cannot deliver, such as restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-occurrence.” said Kaajal Ramjathan-Keogh, ICJ Africa Regional Programme Director. 

Participants addressed persistent gaps between official legal recognition of harm and actual delivery to survivors, noting how administrative reparation awards and truth commission recommendations, such as in South Africa, The Gambia, and Kenya, routinely stall due to such factors as political inertia and administrative bottlenecks. Practitioners mapped strategies to close these accountability deficient gaps, including record-building efforts that harmonize narrative truth-seeking with the strict evidentiary standards and archive disclosure rules required by domestic and regional courts. 

Participants also examined the interface of customary and traditional justice systems, such as those in South Sudan and Rwanda, which were purported to operate on principles of restorative harmony and local reconciliation, while stressing the need for adherence to human rights norms around gender equality and conditional amnesties.

In contexts of severe civic space closure or systemic State immunity, litigators explored extraterritorial jurisdictions and sub-regional courts like the East African Court of Justice (EACJ) and ECOWAS Community Court of Justice to bypass domestic blockades…

“On top of striving to adopt a more victim-oriented approach in the criminal justice system, non-criminal justice avenues at local, regional, and international levels must be explored, reassessed, and strengthened with a view to implementing the rule of law effectively” stated Justice Aruna Devi Narain, ICJ Commissioner and Judge of the Supreme Court of Mauritius. 

The Johannesburg gathering represents the third stage of the ICJ’s multi-year initiative on non-criminal justice mechanisms, following global and regional forums in Geneva (November 2025) and Bogotá (June 2026) The insights gathered in Johannesburg will feed directly into the ICJ’s elaboration of practical global guidance for jurists, litigators, and policymakers on designing and implementing non-criminal justice mechanisms.

The initiative is supported by the Republic and Canton of Geneva. 

Submit Entries for 9th Edition Freedom Prize 2027

October 25, 2026

The Freedom Prize invites young people aged 15 to 25 from France and around the world to nominate an inspiring person or organisation whose work represents an exemplary commitment to freedom. The initiative gives young people an active role in recognising individuals and organisations that promote freedom, peace, human rights, and positive change.Deadline: 12-Jan-2027

The Freedom Prize is an educational initiative inspired by the values associated with the D-Day landings in Normandy. See: https://trueheroesfilms.com/equip/digest/?sort=most&award=fef9ddd0-5b73-11e9-aba0-2ddd74eff7fa

The Freedom Prize is open to young people aged 15 to 25 years old.

The Freedom Prize takes place through three main stages during the school year.

Stage 1: Call for Proposals

Young people aged 15 to 25 are invited to nominate a person or organisation whose fight for freedom deserves international recognition.

Participants research and identify inspiring individuals or organisations and submit their proposals.

This first stage gives young people an opportunity to explore different freedom and human rights movements around the world.

Stage 2: International Youth Jury

An international jury made up of 24 young people from diverse backgrounds meets in Normandy.

The jury reviews the proposed nominees and selects three finalists for the Freedom Prize.

This stage gives young people a direct role in evaluating different examples of courage, commitment and action for freedom.

Stage 3: Global Youth Vote

Following the selection of the three nominees, a global online vote is organised among young people.

Youth participants vote to determine the final laureate of the Freedom Prize.

The process therefore places young people at the centre of the prize, from the initial nominations through to the final selection.

https://www2.fundsforngos.org/individuals/submit-entries-for-9th-edition-freedom-prize-2027/amp

Write for Rights campaign turns 25, here 7 successes

October 24, 2026

Amnesty International

This year marks the 25th anniversary of Amnesty International’s global Write for Rights campaign, which has supported more than 200 people and groups.

That’s 25 years of people taking action against injustice, writing letters and signing petitions in support of people whose human rights have been denied. Some have been imprisoned for peacefully expressing their views. Others have been targeted because of who they are or who they love. Some have been criminalized simply because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

More than 50 million actions have been taken – in the form of letters, emails, cards, petition signatures, social media posts and more – since Write for Rights started in 2001. Amnesty’s brilliant supporters have written letters both to those whose rights are being violated, and the person in authority who can make change happen.

People have taken action because they believe hope and humanity can win over fear.

As a result, over 100 people featured in our Write for Rights campaign have seen a positive outcome in their situation. People unlawfully detained have been released, families have been reunited and justice achieved. Just as important – individuals have been reminded that they have not been forgotten.

Here are the stories of a few of them, whose lives have changed – and even been saved – thanks to the support of people like you…


Germain Rukuki – Burundi

 A man stands bathed in sunlight, looking down the street.
Human rights defender Germain Rukuki was arrested in July 2017 and was serving a 32-year prison sentence after he was convicted of “rebellion” amongst other things. During Amnesty International’s global Write for Rights campaign, supporters in 37 countries took action and called for his immediate and unconditional release. He was released from prison on 30 June 2021.

On 30 June 2021, Burundian human rights defender Germain Rukuki was released from prison four years into a 32-year sentence. He had been found guilty of a number of sham charges relating to his human rights work. He was jailed before getting a chance to hold his youngest child, born just weeks after he was arrested in July 2017.

Yves Makwambala and Fred Bauma – Democratic Republic of Congo

Youth activists Yves Makwambala and Fred Bauma were released at the end of August 2016 in the Democratic Republic of Congo. An amazing 170,000 people took action for the pair as part of Write for Rights 2015. “Every letter, every visit, every word has strengthened us and reinforced our determination in this long but just struggle for freedom and democracy,” said Yves.

Seán Binder – Greece

As night closes in, a man in a dark jumper stands against a brightly lit building.
After more than seven long years, Seán Binder and all 23 defendants were been cleared of all charges in Greece relating to their humanitarian rescue work on Lesvos.

In January 2026, human rights defender Seán Binder and 23 others connected to a search and rescue NGO were acquitted of all charges in Greece. After years on trial, Seán no longer faces the possibility of a 20-year prison sentence for helping refugees.

Eight years after Amnesty first called for the charges to be dropped, Seán was finally acquitted.

Moses Akatugba – Nigeria

A man stands looking to camera with his hands clasped. He wears a red jumper.
Moses was waiting for the results of his secondary school exams when he was arrested by the Nigerian army in 2005, shot in the hand and beaten. After eight years in prison, he was sentenced to death by hanging. Activists including many young people and Amnesty International demonstrated outside their country’s Nigerian embassies his behalf. Moses was freed in 2019.

Moses Akatugba was a 16-year-old student when he was arrested in 2005 by police in southern Nigeria, on suspicion of armed robbery and stealing three telephones. He was tortured by police during their interrogations, beaten and suspended upside down from a ceiling fan for hours. His nails were pulled out with pliers to coerce him into signing a “confession” – the only basis for his death sentence eight years later.

Rita Mahato – Nepal 

Rita Mahato Chamar is a human rights defender from Nepal.

In 2009, human rights defender Rita Mahato was threatened with death, rape and kidnapping for helping women in Nepal who had suffered acts of violence. She was a health adviser at the Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC), a leading NGO in Nepal, yet police failed to provide Rita with protection or to investigate the threats. After Amnesty took up her case for Write for Rights 2009, schools, campuses and other institutions around the world started sending letters, postcards and other materials in support of her. The publicity and posters became so widespread that the police and local authorities began calling Rita to provide support, making her feel less alone. While the harassment has ended, Rita still stands up for what she believes in.

Aleksandra (Sacha) Skochilenko – Russia

A woman with long brown hair
Aleksandra (Sasha) Skochilenko, visits Amnesty in the Netherlands, Amsterdam, to thank them from for their support.

Russian artist Aleksandra “Sacha” Skochilenko was arrested for protesting Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In March 2022, she replaced price tags at a supermarket with paper labels that contained information censored by Russian state-run media. She was charged with “dissemination of knowingly false information about Russian Armed Forces” and sentenced to seven years in December 2023. In 2024, thanks in part to international pressure from Write for Rights 2022, Sacha was finally released as part of a huge prisoner swap, involving Russia and Belarus, who agreed to a swap with the United States, Germany, Norway, Poland, and Slovenia.  Sacha now lives in exile in Germany.

https://amnesty.ca/urgent-actions/outcome-uae-sudanese-political-activist-released-after-19-months

ICC wins EU Parliament’s human rights prize 2026

October 22, 2026

The 2026 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought is collectively awarded to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its officials.

Announcing the 2026 laureate in the hemicycle on Thursday, European Parliament President Roberta Metsola declared: “The European Union is built on respect for multilateralism and international institutions. With the award of the Sakharov prize to the International Criminal Court and its officials, the European Parliament recognises the Court’s important work in upholding international law and justice.”

The International Criminal Court (ICC) investigates and, where warranted, tries individuals charged with the gravest crimes of concern to the international community: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.

The Court is a crucial actor in the global fight to end impunity, and through international criminal justice, it aims to hold those responsible accountable for their crimes and to help prevent these crimes from happening again. As a court of last resort, it seeks to complement national courts. Governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, the ICC is the world’s first permanent international criminal court.

The award highlights the ICC’s work, including investigations, prosecutions, trials and the issuance or authorisation of arrest warrants. See also: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2026/08/13/four-us-human-rights-groups-sue-trump-administration-over-crippling-icc-sanctions/

In Parliament’s 2025 annual reports on the implementation of the common Foreign and Security Policy and on the human rights and democracy in the world, MEPs expressed their deep concern at the growing threats and the various waves of sanctions imposed since 2025 on the ICC, notably by the USA, as well as on its prosecutors, judges, staff and partners, considering these to be serious attacks on the international justice system.

MEPs have repeatedly called on the European Commission to activate the EU’s so-called ‘blocking statute’ to protect officials working at the ICC from extraterritorial attacks, and to enable it to continue its activities in complete independence. The blocking statute protects European operators, regardless of their size or sector of activity, by nullifying within the EU the effect of any foreign judicial decision based on foreign laws, also enabling them to seek compensation in court for damages caused by the extraterritorial application of foreign laws.

For more on this award, see: https://trueheroesfilms.com/equip/digest/?sort=most&laureate=13a10c16-6014-4132-8ed7-c4af3b1ef2a8

A newspaper wondered why the news attracted little attention in the British press, despite the award’s significance [https://leftfootforward.org/2026/10/right-called-out-after-echr-wins-prestigious-award-but-where-was-the-media-coverage/]. But I think there was quie bit worldwide, see e.g.:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/eu-sakharov-prize-icc-9.7391471

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/22/us-sanctioned-icc-wins-sakharov-prize-eus-top-human-rights-award

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20261018IPR48263/the-international-criminal-court-and-its-officials-awarded-the-sakharov-prize

https://www.politico.eu/article/icc-wins-eu-parliaments-human-rights-prize

https://1lurer.am/en/news/1588229

Five Human Rights Defenders Targeted for Seeking Help Abroad

October 19, 2026
Freedom House Logo - Torch next to words Freedom House

PPI Watch_Sept2026

From left to right: Pham Chi Dung, Anar Mammadli, Joshua Wong, Mohammad Seifzadeh, Gasser Abdel Razek (Photo Credits: Pham Chi Dung Facebook, Wikimedia Commons, Center for Human Rights in Iran, Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights)

Brian Tronic, Director, Fred Hiatt Program to Free Political Prisoners, wrote “Dictatorial regimes are retaliating against democratic activists who talk to foreign governments and international bodies“

On September 2, prominent Hong Kong democracy activist Joshua Wong pleaded guilty to charges under the territory’s notorious National Security Act—the second time he has faced prison time under the Beijing-imposed law. Having already been imprisoned since November 2020, he now faces the possibility of another lengthy sentence simply for demanding that Hong Kongers have a voice in their own government. Joshua’s detention has been widely recognized as emblematic of the Chinese Communist Party’s increasing restrictions on freedom in and the autonomy of Hong Kong.

However, his case is also an example of an important but less visible phenomenon: to hide truth about their abuses, dictatorial regimes are criminalizing the act of talking to the outside world. The allegations against Joshua included meetings in the United States with Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi and then Senator Marco Rubio. Unfortunately, activists around the globe are facing similar charges. The following cases highlight the efforts of repressive regimes to shut down engagement with foreign democracies and international bodies that have made protecting democracy part of their mission.

Vietnamese journalist Pham Chi Dung was detained after petitioning members of the European Parliament (EP) to pressure Vietnam over its human rights record. In 2019, he wrote to EP members asking them to postpone ratification of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement until Vietnamese authorities made human rights improvements, and made a similar appeal in a video featured at an event hosted by a British EP member. Two days later, he was arrested. UN experts noted that the arrest “appears to be an act of reprisal for his human rights advocacy.” Dung was later sentenced to 15 years in prison for “conducting antistate propaganda,” and he remains imprisoned today.

Mohammad Seifzadeh, a human rights lawyer in Iran, wrote a letter with other human rights activists to UN Secretary General António Guterres in December 2022, asking him to respond to the Iranian regime’s execution of peaceful protesters. Just a few months later, as a result of the letter, he was convicted of “propaganda against the system” and “spreading false information” and sentenced to a year in prison (though his sentence was eventually suspended for medical reasons).

Azerbaijani activist Anar Mammadli, chair of the Election Monitoring and Democracy Studies Centre (EMDS), was arrested in 2024 a few weeks after calling on Azerbaijani authorities to release political prisoners and respect fundamental rights at events hosted by the UN Human Rights Council and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). A group of UN officials expressed “serious concerns that Mammadli’s detention and prosecution may be in retaliation for his human rights work and his engagement with UN mechanisms.” In 2026, Anar was sentenced to 13 years in prison on a variety of baseless charges.

In November 2020, three staff of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, including Executive Director Gasser Abdel Razek, were arrested a few days after discussing human rights issues with 13 foreign ambassadors and diplomats. While they were released a few weeks later, they were placed under a travel ban that remains in place to this day.

https://freedomhouse.org/article/political-prisoners-watch-five-democracy-advocates-targeted-seeking-help-abroad

Human rights defenders be aware: Russia, Belarus and four Central Asian countries sign pact to exchange information on alleged ‘extremists’

October 15, 2026
Photo: Russian Prosecutor General’s Office
Photo: Russian Prosecutor General’s Office

According to Novaya Gazeta Europe of 1 October 2026, prosecutors general of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have signed an agreement on cooperating to fight terrorism and extremism, Russian state-affiliated business daily RBC reported on Wednesday.

The agreement provides for the timely exchange of information on organisations, groups and individuals that the signatories consider “terrorist” or “extremist” and classify as national security threats. The countries will also reportedly share information on such groups’ international ties, possible attacks and threats to their sovereignty.

Additionally, the deal covers information on illegal armed groups; human, arms and drug traffickers; organisers of illegal migration; and foreign terrorist fighters.

Russia routinely uses terrorism and extremism charges to prosecute political opponents. The laws have become a tool for pressuring human rights defenders, antiwar activists and other groups the authorities see as disloyal.

According to a count by the independent outlet Mediazona, Russian authorities had opened at least 225 criminal cases for “financing extremism” over donations to the late opposition leader Alexey Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation as of April 2026. In the first half of 2026 alone, more than 1,200 people in Russia were convicted on terrorism-related charges, a 38% increase from the same period last year. Nearly a third were tried solely over things they had said.

https://novayagazeta.eu/en/articles/2026/10/01/russia-belarus-and-four-central-asian-countries-sign-pact-to-exchange-information-on-alleged-extremists-en-news

Nominations for the 2027 Right Livelihood Award are now open!

October 14, 2026

Nominations for the 2027 Right Livelihood Award are now open.

If you know any courageous change-makers striving to create a more just, peaceful, and sustainable world for all? RLF welcomesnominations from all over the world, people of all ages and backgrounds. Deadline To be considered for the 2027 Award, nominations must be submitted by January 24, 2027. You can submit through our online form in English, French, and Spanish.

The Call for Nominations remains open year-round, but any submissions received after this date will be assessed in the following year.

For any questions: research@rightlivelihood.org.

Find out more about the Award: https://trueheroesfilms.com/equip/digest/?sort=most&award=97238E26-A05A-4A7C-8A98-0D267FDDAD59

Thai Prime Minister files criminal defamation complaint against human rights defender Yingcheep Atachanont

October 12, 2026

On 8 October 2026, the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a partnership of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), requests urgent intervention in the following situation in Thailand.

The Observatory has been informed that a criminal defamation complaint has been filed by Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul against Mr. Yingcheep Atchanont, director of the Thai non-governmental organisation Internet Law Reform Dialogue (iLaw), an FIDH member organisation, in connection with his legitimate work of monitoring public affairs and promoting democratic accountability.

On 15 September 2026, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul filed a criminal defamation complaint against Yingcheep under Article 326 (“defamation”) and 328 (“libel”) of Thailand’s Criminal Code with the Bangkok Criminal Court.

This development follows the announcement made by the Prime Minister on 22 July 2026 that he would take legal action against Yingcheep. The Prime Minister’s criminal defamation complaint stems from Yingcheep Atchanont’s submission of a petition to the opposition coalition in the House of Representatives on 21 July 2026, seeking a parliamentary examination of allegations that nine politicians from the ruling Bhumjaithai Party, including Prime Minister Anutin, five cabinet ministers, and three senior figures, were involved in vote manipulation during the June 2024 Senate election. According to iLaw’s investigation, evidence and witness statements suggested irregularities including candidate arrangements, the distribution of voting instructions, and the provision of financial incentives to candidates by networks linked to the Bhumjaithai Party, across different stages of the election process, which raised serious concerns over the integrity and transparency of the polls.

The Observatory recalls that since its founding in 2009, iLaw has played a prominent role in advancing democratic participation, freedom of expression, and a fair justice system in Thailand. The organisation has documented the impact of repressive laws and decrees adopted following the 2006 and 2014 military coups d’état and campaigned for their reform through public engagement and online advocacy. It has also worked to support citizen participation in legislative and constitutional reform processes, particularly through campaigns to collect signatures for proposed legislation and initiatives to amend Thailand’s military-backed 2017 Constitution. In addition, iLaw has contributed to strengthening electoral transparency by systematically documenting voting irregularities and mobilising citizens to participate in election observation.

The June 2024 Senate election gave rise to allegations of systemic fraud and vote-buying. Under a new selection system, more than 40,000 candidates voted among themselves through multiple rounds of selection at the district, provincial, and national levels to determine the 200-member Senate. The results led to public scrutiny particularly due to the disproportionately high number of successful candidates from provinces where the Bhumjaithai Party enjoyed strong electoral support…

The Observatory denounces the criminal lawsuits against Yingcheep, which appear to be in retaliation against the peaceful exercise of his right to freedom of expression, as enshrined in international human rights law, in particular in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Thailand is a state party.

The Observatory calls upon the Thai authorities to ensure that all complaints are dropped and urges them to take concrete steps towards the decriminalisation of defamation under Articles 326 and 328 of the Criminal Code, which are used to intimidate, silence, and harass human rights defenders in Thailand.

https://www.fidh.org/en/issues/human-rights-defenders/thailand-criminal-defamation-complaints-filed-against-human-rights