Posts Tagged ‘Artificial intelligence’

A Guide to Supercharging HRD Movement with Artificial Intelligence

November 4, 2026
Human Rights Foundation

The HRF announced on 22 September 2026 a new guide to understand AI and how to use it safely to defend freedom

Artificial intelligence (AI) is often described as the most transformative technology of our time. Its meteoric development is reshaping industries, economies, and the way people work, communicate, and create. Governments are investing billions of dollars into it. Corporations are racing to build ever more capable AI systems. News headlines alternate between promises of extraordinary breakthroughs and warnings about existential risks.

For activists, journalists, researchers, and civil society organizations, however, the question is much simpler: What does AI mean for the work I do every day

The reality is that authoritarian regimes are already using AI to expand surveillance, censorship, and social control. At the same time, activists are using it to research faster, build new tools, and amplify their impact. AI itself is neither democratic nor authoritarian. Like any powerful tool, its impact depends on who controls it and how it is used.

Gene Sharp, the author of the book “From Dictatorship to Democracy” and the world’s foremost scholar of nonviolent revolution, spent decades documenting that even the most entrenched authoritarian regimes depend on the consent and cooperation of their subjects, and that organized, disciplined resistance can withdraw that consent. AI doesn’t change that logic, but it does change the scale and speed at which activists can act on it.

That is what this guide is about: Helping dissidents understand AI and how to use it safely to defend freedom, and bringing them to realize that they do not need a technical background to follow along.

This guide is specially written for people working to strengthen democracy, defend human rights, and build more open societies while living and working under authoritarian regimes. It focuses on the practical applications of AI rather than the technical details behind it. You will learn how to use AI chat tools, build applications without hiring a software developer, create personal AI agents, protect your privacy, and automate parts of your work. The emphasis throughout is on practical skills you can begin using right away.

And no, you do not need to learn how to code, understand machine learning, or become a technology expert. You don’t need to know any of these things to use the internet, and the same applies here. What you do need is time to experiment and understand what these tools can do, where their risks lie, and how to use them safely and effectively.

That said, no guide can keep pace with a technology that evolves this quickly. New models and tools will be released. Some of the examples in these pages will eventually become outdated (we will do our best to keep this guide updated). But the underlying lessons will remain the same. AI is becoming a source of leverage in the struggle for freedom in fully and hybrid authoritarian countries in every corner of the world, including, for example, Venezuela, Russia, India or Thailand. Understanding how to use it well will increasingly be a prerequisite for effective advocacy in the years to come.

Please note that this resource is not meant to convince you that AI is the answer to every problem. It is not. Human rights work will always depend on courage, judgment, trust, and human relationships. No algorithm can replace those things. But AI can help the people who possess them work faster, reach further, and achieve more.

There is also a lesson worth remembering. When social media emerged, activists and developers alike were slow to grasp how dictators would exploit it, and that delay came at a real cost to the safety and privacy of activists and pro-democracy movements. We cannot afford to repeat that mistake.

As AI reshapes the world, those defending freedom need to be early, not late, in understanding its strengths, its risks, and how to use it well. Activists, especially ones working in a high-risk environment, should treat AI as a core tool, not an adjacent one, and devote real time to understanding it.

Civil liberties advocates should help shape the AI future, not simply follow into a future designed by others who don’t share the same concerns.

We hope this guide gives you the knowledge, confidence, and practical tools to do exactly that

Protecting the storytellers: Women journalists on the frontline of conflict

October 30, 2026

On 28 October 2026 Ana Carmo reported on an event organised by the Permanent Mission of Greece, gender equality agency UN Women, and the UN education and culture agency, UNESCO,Every Voice for Peace Counts: New Perspectives on the Women, Peace and Security Agenda.

“Every woman journalist driven out of a conflict zone is a peace process that loses its witness,” said Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Ressa, addressing the United Nations this week. Ms. Ressa, who has faced arrest, legal cases and sustained online attacks, reiterated how intimidation can wear down journalists’ credibility and confidence, threaten their safety and ultimately kill their determination to continue reporting. At the height of the attacks against her, she received 90 hate messages an hour

Artificial intelligence is adding to the threat, enabling deepfakes, fabricated sexual images, cloned voices and coordinated attacks to spread at scale.

According to UN Women data, nearly one in four women human rights defenders, activists and journalists reported experiencing AI-enabled abuse which in time can manifest as physical violence.

Recent research highlights how online attacks – once dismissed as “virtual” problems – are now spilling offline, affecting women’s safety, well-being, and ability to participate freely in public debate.

Ms. Ressa called for online violence to be treated as such, arguing for stronger accountability for perpetrators and technology companies that amplify abuse, sustained funding for women-led journalism, and the inclusion of women journalists in peace and security discussions.

Protecting women journalists is not only about individual safety. It is also about whose experiences of conflict are documented, whose voices shape public understanding and whose contributions to peace are recognised.

“When women journalists are silenced, the women whose stories they are telling are also silenced,” said UN Women Deputy Executive Director for Normative Support, UN System Coordination, and Programme Results, Nyaradzai Gumbonzvanda. “So, it’s not just the silencing of the journalists, it’s the silencing of our collective story.”

Women in conflict settings are often portrayed as victims, she noted, despite their roles in preventing violence, mediating disputes, sustaining communities and rebuilding societies. When their experiences go unreported, the public sees only part of the reality of war, “half of the picture of peace”.

The scale of the problem is stark. According to a recent study by UN Women and UNESCO, 75 per cent of women journalists surveyed had experienced online violence. Forty-two per cent linked online attacks to abuse or assault in the physical world, up from 20 per cent in 2020.

International frameworks for protecting journalists already exist. Yet women journalists continue to face physical violence, legal harassment, psychological trauma and online campaigns designed to discredit their reporting.

As the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists approaches on 2 November, UNESCO is preparing to launch a new campaign – Threats Evolve, Impunity Endures – alongside new findings on journalist safety and impunity.

“Every voice for peace counts,” said Ms. Ressa, “but a voice only counts if it is heard, if that woman survives being heard.”

Watch the event on UN WebTV:

https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/10/1168691

What if AI could be a tool for freedom? HRF’s Alex Gladstein thinks so.

August 7, 2026

Chief Strategy Officer, Alex Gladstein, of the Human Rights Foundation featured on BBC World Service

HRF’s Chief Strategy Officer, Alex Gladstein, featured on BBC World Service

HRF Profile

Human Rights Foundation

What if AI could be a tool for freedom? In conversation with Owen Clegg from BBC World Service, Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer at the Human Rights Foundation, explores how artificial intelligence can empower human rights activists, expand access to information, and help counter authoritarian uses of technology.

While AI is often framed through the lens of risk, Alex explores how the technology can also empower activists, journalists, and opposition movements around the world by supercharging their work through personal and organizational agents. He points to Venezuela, where opposition groups responding to a humanitarian crisis have used AI to quickly build crowdfunding infrastructure that would otherwise have required significant time, technical expertise, and resources helping deliver aid. Listen to the full conversation below.

To learn more about the AI for Individual Rights program, join HRF’s AI newsletter. Subscribe here

Digital services alternatives on APC’s community network; better not bigger

May 21, 2026

On 20 May 2026 , Maja Romano wrote a long piece “Better not bigger: Digital services alternatives across our network“.

A recent article in The Guardian highlighted the growing public interest in moving away from dominant corporate platforms such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Apple and X to more rights-respecting and sustainable alternatives, mentioning APC member GreenNet as one example of an ethical internet service provider. The article reflects an increasingly common concern: dependence on a concentrated number of big tech companies leaves communities vulnerable to surveillance, control, political interference and environmental harm. Yet much of the debate in the Global North still frames the issue primarily through market competition, for example, how Europe can reduce dependence on American technology giants by supporting European companies instead.

For many members and partners in the APC network, the challenge runs much deeper than replacing one corporate provider with another and is not as simple as assessing whether technology is headquartered in the United States, Europe or elsewhere, nor is it simply a matter of creating alternatives for individual personal choices. It is about who controls digital infrastructure and services, whose interests it serves, and whether communities have meaningful power and agency over the technologies they use. It means fostering an environment that encourages the development of diverse technologies, grounded in lived experiences, which can reinforce rights rather than undermine them.

Across APC’s network, there are member organisations who have spent years building community-centred and rights-respecting alternatives rooted in social and environmental justice alongside collective care. Their work offers a different vision of the digital future, one where infrastructure is seen not as a profit-driven extractivist commodity, but as a commons. Within this article we connect with several members and APC’s own tech team for their reflections on alternatives to big tech services.

read more on: https://www.apc.org/en/news/better-not-bigger-digital-services-alternatives-across-our-network

9 March 2026: important Geneva event on transnational repression of human rights defenders

March 4, 2026

The event “Tackling the protection gap: Host States’ responsibility to prevent and respond to transnational repression” will bring together defenders and UN experts to discuss the international human rights law obligations of States in respect of transnational repression against individuals and groups within their territory, as well as the strengthening of international standards, and gaps arising from shortcomings in their implementation domestically.

Location: Geneva, Switzerland. Date: 09 March 2026. Palais des Nations, Room VIII. Time: 2:00PM – 3:00PM CET and livestreamed on ISHR’s YouTube channel.!

Research from international organisations, NGOs and academics shows that transnational repression (TNR) – acts by States and their proxies to deter, silence or punish dissent, criticism or advocacy outside their territory – is affecting a growing array of individuals and groups worldwide.[1] With the emergence of new surveillance and communication technologies, many actors have found new avenues to silence and punish critics and opponents. The most common targets have been exiled human rights defenders and political activists, but today broader groups such as journalists, lawyers, artists, academics and ordinary members of diaspora communities are frequently targeted. See e.g.

https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2024/03/19/transnational-repression-human-rights-watch-and-other-reports/ and

https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2024/03/19/transnational-repression-human-rights-watch-and-other-reports/

Freedom House Transnational Repression dataset: https://freedomhouse.org/report/transnational-repression

Human Rights Watch, “We Will Find You” A Global Look at How Governments Repress Nationals Abroad, 2024, https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/02/22/we-will-find-you/global-look-how-governments-repress-nationals-abroad;

The immediate effect of TNR is the violation of, or constraint on the exercise of, fundamental human rights. States have obligations towards those subject to such violations taking effect within their territory. These obligations have long been recognised, but have not yet been the subject of focused discussion in relation to TNR, leaving the scope and nature of the duties of host States unclear.

This event will bring together defenders and UN experts to discuss the international human rights law obligations of States in respect of transnational repression against individuals and groups within their territory, as well as the strengthening of international standards, and gaps arising from shortcomings in their implementation domestically.

Speakers: 

  • Sayed Ahmed al-Wadaei, Director of Advocacy, Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD)
  • Birgit Kainz-Labbe, Coordinator of Civic Space Unit, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
  • Ben Saul, UN Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights
  • Hélène Tigroudja, Human Rights Committee, Vice-Chair

Moderator: Raphael Viana David, International Service for Human Rights 

This event is organised by ISHR and co-hosted with Human Rights Watch, Human Rights House Foundation and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH).


https://ishr.ch/events/tackling-the-protection-gap-host-states-responsibility-to-prevent-and-respond-to-transnational-repression

https://sovanews.tv/en/2026/04/19/freedom-house-lists-georgia-among-countries-using-transnational-repression-tactics/amp/

see also: https://www.techpolicy.press/how-ai-is-powering-transnational-repression/

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/digital-exile-when-distance-does-not-end-the-threat-exile-is-often-imagined-as-an-escape

HURIDOCS looking for a Global Repository Coordinator

February 9, 2026

HURIDOCS is recruiting a 👉 Global Repository Coordinator 👈 , a fixed-term role focused on a project that’s been in the works here for a long time. This Global Repository is where so many threads finally come together. Years of work on machine learning, documentation, and human rights data, all coming into one shared “playground” to help unlock judgments, decisions, and human rights information at scale.

We’re building this together with partners, including the The Patrick J. McGovern Foundation and the Oxford Institute of Technology and Justice ( supported by the Clooney Foundation for Justice). This short video from Oxford gives a glimpse of the vision (at min 2:17).

https://lnkd.in/gmQaxxad

Because this is such an exciting and ambitious role, we’re looking for someone who’s dynamic, independent, and a great problem-solver. Someone who knows how to push things forward and also when to when to slow down and consult, with communities, partners, donors, and more. Someone comfortable with the international human rights ecosystem and committed to leveraging technology for justice.

Often when we’re recruiting for roles like this we talk about looking for a unicorn, but this time that doesn’t quite work. I think we’re really looking for a tiger. Someone who can help us actually make this thing real. 🐯


📣HURIDOCS is looking for a Project Coordinator to play a key role in building the Global Repository of Human Rights.



Applications sent by email or direct message will not be considered. Please apply via the form provided in the job description.

hashtag#NGOJobs hashtag#ProjectCoordinator hashtag#RemoteJobs

New study shows that on-line attacks against women human rights defenders doubled

December 16, 2025
Stressed businesswoman working on laptop at home, tired freelancer

On 15 December 2025 Emma Woollacott, in Forbes, referred to a new study that shows that 7 in 10 women human rights defenders, activists and journalists have experienced online violence in the course of their work. Produced through the UN Women’s ACT to End Violence against Women program and supported by the European Commission, “Tipping point: The chilling escalation of violence against women in the public sphere” draws on a global survey of women from 119 countries.

Along with online threats and harassment, more than 4 in 10 have experienced offline harm linked to online abuse — more than twice as many as in 2020, the researchers found. This can range from verbal harassment right up to physical assault, stalking and swatting.

“These figures confirm that digital violence is not virtual — it’s real violence with real-world consequences,” said Sarah Hendricks, director of policy, programme and intergovernmental division at UN Women.

“Women who speak up for our human rights, report the news or lead social movements are being targeted with abuse designed to shame, silence and push them out of public debate. Increasingly, those attacks do not stop at the screen — they end at women’s front doors. We cannot allow online spaces to become platforms for intimidation that silence women and undermine democracy.”

And AI is only making things worse, with almost 1 in 4 women human rights defenders, activists and journalists having experienced AI-assisted online violence, such as deepfake imagery and manipulated content. This is most often the case for writers and public communicators who focus on human rights issues, such as social media content creators and influencers, for whom the figure reaches 30%.

“Gender-based online violence is not a new phenomenon, but its scale certainly is,” said report co-author Lea Hellmueller, associate professor in journalism at City St George’s and associate dean for research in the School of Communication and Creativity.

“AI tools enable the production of cheaper and faster abusive content, which is detrimental to women in public life — and beyond,” Hellmueller added.

Tech firms are partly responsible, the researchers said, with the report calling for better tools to identify, monitor, report and fend off AI-assisted online violence. The researchers also want to see more legal and regulatory mechanisms to force tech firms to prevent their technologies being deployed against women in the public sphere.

“Our next steps include publishing data from the survey about the opportunities for, and barriers to, law enforcement and legal redress for survivors of online violence,” said Julie Posetti, chair of the Centre for Journalism and Democracy at City St George’s, University of London, one of the authors of the report. “We will also focus on creative efforts to counter gender-based online violence and policy recommendations to help hold the Big Tech facilitators of this dangerous phenomenon accountable.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2025/12/15/online-attacks-against-women-human-rights-workers-double-in-five-years/

https://www.globalissues.org/news/2025/12/15/41907

https://theconversation.com/ai-tools-are-being-used-to-subject-women-in-public-life-to-online-violence-271703

https://www.globalissues.org/amp/news/2026/01/07/42053

New report: a retrospective on the Business frameworks and actions to support defenders

August 10, 2025

ISHR launched a new report  that summarises and assesses progress and challenges over the past decade in relation to initiatives to protect human rights defenders in the context of business frameworks, guidance, initiatives and tools that have emerged at local, national and regional levels. The protection of human rights defenders in relation to business activities is vital.

Defenders play a crucial role in safeguarding human rights and environmental standards against adverse impacts of business operations globally. Despite their essential work, defenders frequently face severe risks, including threats, surveillance, legal and judicial harassment, and violence.  

According to the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC), more than 6,400 attacks on defenders linked to business activities have been documented over the past decade, emphasising the urgency of addressing these challenges.  While this situation is not new, and civil society organisations have constantly pushed for accountability for and prevention of these attacks, public awareness of the issue increased with early efforts to raise the visibility of defenders at the Human Rights Council and the adoption of key thematic resolutions, as well as raising defenders’ voices at other foras like the UN Forum on Business and Human Rights. 

The report ‘Business Frameworks and Actions to Support Human Rights Defenders: a Retrospective and Recommendations’ takes stock of the frameworks, tools, and advocacy developed over the last decade to protect and support human rights defenders in the context of business activities and operations.

The report examines how various standards have been operationalised through company policies, investor guidance, multi-stakeholder initiatives, legal reforms, and sector-specific commitments. At the same time, it highlights how despite these advancements, the actual implementation by businesses remains inadequate. Effective corporate action remains insufficient, highlighting a critical gap that must be urgently addressed to ensure defenders can safely carry out their vital work protecting human rights and environmental justice. In order to address this, drawing on case studies, civil society tracking tools, and policy analysis, the report identifies key barriers to effective protection and proposes targeted recommendations. 
Download the report

Witness’ Sam Gregory gave Gruber Lecture on artificial intelligence and human rights advocacy

June 23, 2025
Sam Gregory Headshot

Sam Gregory delivered the Spring 2025 Gruber Distinguished Lecture on Global Justice on March 24, 2025, at 4:30 pm at Yale Law School. The lecture was co-moderated by his faculty hosts, Binger Clinical Professor Emeritus of Human Rights Jim Silk ’89 and David Simon, assistant dean for Graduate Education, senior lecturer in Global Affairs and director of the Genocide Studies Program at Yale University. Gregory is the executive director of WITNESS, a human rights nonprofit organization that empowers individuals and communities to use technology to document human rights abuses and advocate for justice. He is an internationally recognized expert on using digital media and smartphone witnessing to defend and protect human rights. With over two decades of experience in the intersection of technology, media, and human rights, Gregory has become a leading figure in the field of digital advocacy. He previously launched the “Prepare, Don’t Panic” initiative in 2018 to prompt concerted, effective, and context-sensitive policy responses to deepfakes and deceptive AI issues worldwide. He focuses on leveraging emerging solutions like authenticity infrastructure, trustworthy audiovisual witnessing, and livestreamed/co-present storytelling to address misinformation, media manipulation, and rising authoritarianism.

Gregory’s lecture, entitled “Fortifying Truth, Trust and Evidence in the Face of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology,” focused on the challenges that artificial intelligence poses to truth, trust, and human rights advocacy. Generative AI’s rapid development and impact on how media is made, edited, and distributed affects how digital technology can be used to expose human rights violations and defend human rights. Gregory considered how photos and videos – essential tools for human rights documentation, evidence, and storytelling – are increasingly distrusted in an era of widespread skepticism and technological advancements that enable deepfakes and AI-generated content. AI can not only create false memories, but also “acts as a powerful conduit for plausible deniability.” Gregory discussed AI’s impact on the ability to believe and trust human rights voices and its role in restructuring the information ecosystem. The escalating burden of proof for human rights activists and the overwhelming volume of digital content underscore how AI can both aid and hinder accountability efforts.

In the face of these concerns, Gregory emphasized the need for human rights defenders to work shape AI systems proactively. He stressed that AI requires a foundational, systemic architecture that ensures information systems serve, rather than undermine, human rights work. Gregory reflected that “at the fundamental (level), this is work enabled by technology, but it’s not about technology.” Digital technologies provide new mechanisms for exposing violence and human rights abuse; the abuse itself has not changed. He also pointed to the need to invest in robust community archives to protect the integrity of human rights evidence against false memories. Stressing the importance of epistemic justice, digital media literacy, and equitable access to technology and technological knowledge, Gregory discussed WITNESS’ work in organizing for digital media literacy and access in human rights digital witnessing, particularly in response to generative AI. One example he highlighted was training individuals how to film audiovisual witnessing videos in ways that are difficult for AI to replicate.

As the floor opened to questions, Gregory pointed to “authenticity infrastructure” as one building block to verify content and maintain truth. Instead of treating information as a binary between AI and not AI, it is necessary to understand the entire “recipe” of how information is created, locating it along the continuum of how AI permeates modern communication. AI must be understood, not disregarded. This new digital territory will only become more relevant in human rights work, Gregory maintained. The discussion also covered regulatory challenges, courts’ struggles with AI generated and audiovisual evidence at large, the importance of AI-infused media literacy, and the necessity of strong civil society institutions in the face of corporate media control.A recording of the lecture is available here.

https://law.yale.edu/centers-workshops/gruber-program-global-justice-and-womens-rights/gruber-lectures/samuel-gregory

International conference on ‘AI and Human Rights’ in Doha

May 27, 2025
HE Chairperson of the NHRC Maryam bint Abdullah Al Attiyah

Chairperson of the NHRC Maryam bint Abdullah Al Attiyah

The international conference ‘Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights: Opportunities, Risks, and Visions for a Better Future,’ gets under way in Doha today. Organised by the National Human Rights Committee (NHRC), the two-day event is being held in collaboration with the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), and Qatar’s Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT) and National Cyber Security Agency, along with other international entities active in the fields of digital tools and technology.

Chairperson of the NHRC Maryam bint Abdullah Al Attiyah, said in a statement Monday that the conference discusses one of the most prominent human rights issues of our time, one that is becoming increasingly important, especially with the tremendous and growing progress in the field of artificial intelligence, which many human rights activists around the world fear will impact the rights of many individuals worldwide.

She added, that the developments in AI that is observed every day requires the establishment of a legal framework that governs the rights of every individual, whether related to privacy or other rights. The framework must also regulate and control the technologies developed by companies, ensuring that rights are not infringed upon, and that the development of AI technologies is not synonymous with the pursuit of financial gain, neglecting the potential infringements on the rights of individuals and communities.

She emphasised that the conference aims to discuss the impact of AI on human rights, not only limiting itself to the challenges it poses to the lives of individuals, but also extending to identifying the opportunities it presents to human rights specialists around the world. She noted that the coming period must witness a deep focus on this area, which is evolving by the hour.

The conference is expected to bring together around 800 partners from around the world to discuss the future of globalisation. Target attendees include government officials, policymakers, AI and technology experts, human rights defenders and activists, legal professionals, AI ethics specialists, civil society representatives, academics and researchers, international organisations, private sector companies, and technology developers.

..The conference is built around 12 core themes and key topics. It focuses on the foundations of artificial intelligence, including fundamental concepts such as machine learning and natural language processing. It also addresses AI and privacy-its impact on personal data, surveillance, and privacy rights. Other themes include bias and discrimination, with an emphasis on addressing algorithmic bias and ensuring fairness, as well as freedom of expression and the role of AI in content moderation, censorship, and the protection of free speech.

The International conference aims to explore the impact of AI on human rights and fundamental freedoms, analyse the opportunities and risks associated with AI from a human rights perspective, present best practices and standards for the ethical use of AI, and engage with policymakers, technology experts, civil society, and the private sector to foster multi-stakeholder dialogue. It also seeks to propose actionable policy and legal framework recommendations to ensure that AI development aligns with human rights principles.

Participating experts will address the legal and ethical frameworks, laws, policies, and ethical standards for the responsible use of artificial intelligence. They will also explore the theme of “AI and Security,” including issues related to militarisation, armed conflicts, and the protection of human rights. Additionally, the conference will examine AI and democracy, focusing on the role of AI in shaping democratic institutions and promoting inclusive participation.

Conference participants will also discuss artificial intelligence and the future of media from a human rights-based perspective, with a focus on both risks and innovation. The conference will further examine the transformations brought about by AI in employment and job opportunities, its impact on labor rights and economic inequality, as well as the associated challenges and prospects.

As part of its ongoing commitment to employing technology in service of humanity and supporting the ethical use of emerging technologies, the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT) is also partnering in organising the conference.

for some other posts on Qatar, see: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/tag/qatar/

https://www.gulf-times.com/article/705199/qatar/international-conference-on-ai-and-human-rights-opens-in-doha-tuesday