Posts Tagged ‘Norway’

Two human rights defenders continue to be prosecuted in Greece in spite of everything..why??

October 6, 2026

On 3 October 2026 Human Rights Watch and others lament the weird insistence of Greece to go ahead with the prosecution of two prominent human rights defenders as a politically-motivated attempt to silence their efforts to expose abuses against migrants, The trial of the two activists, Panayote Dimitras and Tommy Olsen, is set to begin on the Greek island of Rhodes on 6 October 2026. See also: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2025/11/21/human-rights-defenders-in-greece-on-trial-for-baseless-charges-for-assisting-people-on-the-move/

“The upcoming trial of Panayote Dimitras and Tommy Olsen is a blatant attempt to criminalize and silence their legitimate human rights work,” said Eva Cossé, senior Europe researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Prosecutors should drop this politically motivated case against Dimitras and Olsen once and for all.”

Dimitras, founder and president of the Greek nongovernmental group Greek Helsinki Monitor, and Olsen, a Norwegian national and founder of the nongovernmental group Aegean Boat Report, are being prosecuted alongside two Cameroonian asylum seekers on charges of “forming or joining for profit and by profession a criminal organization with the purpose of facilitating the entry and stay of third country nationals into Greek territory.” If convicted, they face up to 20 years in prison.

The charges brought against the activists in early 2023 stem from their peaceful human rights and humanitarian work, Human Rights Watch said. The indictment seeks to criminalize the defendants’ practice of notifying Greek authorities and international bodies of the whereabouts of newly arrived asylum seekers and migrants on the Greek islands, to help ensure that they have access to the country’s asylum procedure and not be pushed back to Türkiye.

Dimitras and Olsen have for years documented and exposed human rights violations against asylum seekers and migrants, including violent pushbacks by Greek authorities, that have been characterized as “systematic” by the European Court of Human Rights.

On May 15, a Norwegian appeals court rejected Greek authorities’ request to extradite Olsen, who lives in Norway, to Greece through a European Arrest Warrant. The Norwegian court concluded that the acts described by Greek authorities do not constitute criminal offenses under Norwegian law, noting that assisting someone in initiating an asylum procedure is a lawful act protected by international treaties. The court also found that extraditing Olsen to Greece would present a real risk of violating his right to freedom of expression.

Because Greek prosecutors have maintained arrest warrants, including the European Arrest Warrant, against Olsen, Olsen faces arrest and detention if he travels to Greece to defend himself. Dimitras who lives in Greece, is not in detention but is subject to a travel ban preventing him from leaving the country. The court summons specifies that, under Greek law, defendants will be tried in their absence if they do not appear or are not represented by a lawyer.

Proceeding on that basis would amount to an in absentia prosecution under international law. Under international law, including the European Convention on Human Rights, to which Greece is a party, anyone convicted in absentia, who later returns to the country where the conviction was issued, should have the opportunity to a fresh determination of the merits of their case by a court there.

The prosecution of Dimitras and Olsen is part of a wider, well-documented pattern of Greek authorities misusing criminal and administrative law to harass and intimidate human rights activists and civil society organizations defending the rights of asylum seekers and migrants. In January, a Greek court on the island of Lesbos acquitted 24 humanitarian workers of similar charges, after prosecutors subjected them to a devastating seven-year legal ordeal.

Despite this high-profile acquittal, Greek authorities have failed to change course, Human Rights Watch said. In February, the Greek government passed a migration law that makes membership in a nongovernmental organization an aggravating circumstance in migration-related criminal offenses, in some cases elevating them to felonies, with draconian penalties.

In 2023, the then-United Nations special rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Mary Lawlor, stated in a report to the UN Human Rights Council that “human rights lawyers, humanitarian workers, volunteers and journalists [working on migration in Greece] have been subjected to smear campaigns, a changing regulatory environment, threats and attacks, and the misuse of criminal law against them, to a shocking degree.” Lawlor has also said that the criminal investigation against Dimitras and Olsen “strongly appears” to be arbitrary.

“The Norwegian court firmly recognized that helping people present themselves to seek asylum is not a crime,” Cossé said. “Greek authorities should take a cue from the court and end this farce by dropping the case and halting the weaponization of criminal law against human rights defenders.”

https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/10/03/greece-rights-defenders-on-trial

https://euobserver.com/241141/they-want-to-shut-me-up-norwegian-activist-fights-20year-greek-prison-threat-over-asylum-aid

https://www.fidh.org/en/issues/human-rights-defenders/greece-migrants-rights-defenders-tommy-olsen-and-panayote-dimitras-to

https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/case/continued-judicial-harassment-and-trial-against-human-rights-defender-panayote-dimitras

https://ecre.org/mediterranean-ngo-questions-states-willingness-to-save-lives-after-latest-tragedy-%E2%80%95-trial-of-human-rights-defenders-in-greece-postponed-until-april-2027-%E2%80%95-european-court-cond/

Two ethnic Vietnamese human rights defenders missing in Cambodia

September 29, 2026
Ethnic Vietnamese activists missing in Cambodia

Two members of Viet Tan, Nguyen Duc Thuan and Tran Hiep, have been missing in Cambodia since Sept. 18, 2026. To date, their families and colleagues have received no information about their whereabouts. (Photo:viettan.org)

Two ethnic Vietnamese Catholics — an Australian and a Norwegian — have gone missing in Cambodia after meeting with activists from the Viet Tan movement, which advocates for a free and democeacy. As reported by UCA news on 28 September 2026.

Nguyen Duc Thuan and Tran Hiep are long-time human rights defenders. Clearly, this is not an ordinary missing persons case. They disappeared 10 days ago. Friends and family want to know: Where is Thuan? Where is Hiep? If Vietnamese intelligence agents operating in Cambodia had a hand in their disappearance or abduction, then this must be brought to light and the Hanoi government must be accountable for acts of transnational repression, Hoang told UCA News.

Both men flew into Phnom Penh on Sept. 15 from Bangkok and were scheduled to leave Sept. 19, but they never boarded their flights, Hoang said, adding Hiep last spoke with his mother on Sept. 18 about an upcoming family birthday.

United States-based Viet Tan is banned in Vietnam and is officially designated as a terrorist organization. Its members have been handed lengthy jail terms for plotting to overthrow the country’s one-party communist government.

However, human rights groups are increasingly concerned about transnational repression, alleging Southeast Asian countries were turning a blind eye to foreign governments, extending their reach beyond national borders to harass and silence their critics.

While details are still a bit sketchy, the sudden disappearance of these two Viet Tan activists has all the hallmarks of transnational repression,  said Phil Robertson, Director of Asia Human Rights and Labour Advocates.

Hoang said Viet Tan members in Vietnam and around the world had for many years connected regularly with activists and civil society organizations to exchange ideas and offer mutual support while Thuan and Hiep were also active in their local communities.

Since news of their disappearance became known, several Catholic congregations have planned prayer vigils for their safe return and posted messages in support.

Hoang said Viet Tan was working closely with the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade in trying to locate the pair.

https://www.ucanews.com/amp/ethnic-vietnamese-activists-missing-in-cambodia/115523

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/sep/29/melbourne-human-rights-activist-tran-hiep-missing-cambodia-ntwnfb

Just came in: What initially appeared to be the disappearance of two activists in Cambodia has now developed into a case involving three countries, allegations of terrorism and accusations of transnational repression. Vietnamese authorities have since confirmed that Hiep and Thuan are in custody in Vietnam. Their organisation, Viet Tan, says something very different happened from the official account: according to the group, the two men were abducted while still in Cambodia and forcibly transported across the border into Vietnam. ABC News

https://www.channeldraw.org/2026/09/29/tran-hiep-an-australian-human-rights-activist-disappears-in-cambodia-and-reappears-in-vietnamese-custody/

https://cambodianess.com/article/impossible-wife-slams-missing-activist-terror-claims

FIFA under fire for Peace Prize for Trump

May 2, 2026

On 19 January 2026 I reported on FIFA’s misguided effort to please President Trump with a suddenly created peace prize. See:

Now criticism within European football circles of FIFA has intensified after the president of the Norwegian Football Association, Liz Klavenes, called for the cancellation of the ‘Peace Prize’ arguing that the move constitutes a clear breach of the principle of political neutrality. Klavénes, who also sits on the Executive Committee of the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), confirmed that she would raise this issue during the FIFA Congress, stressing the need for world football’s governing body to maintain a “distance” from political leaders.

In a notable escalation, Klavenis announced her support for an ethics complaint filed against FIFA President Gianni Infantino, over his role in awarding the trophy, amid accusations of breaching neutrality rules. According to The Athletic, the complaint — filed by the human rights organisation Fair Square — alleges that Infantino politically promoted a public figure whilst in office, as well as awarding a politically charged prize without a clear institutional process and bypassing official structures within FIFA, including the Congress. These findings suggest a possible breach of FIFA’s Code of Ethics, which requires its officials to maintain complete neutrality regarding political matters.

Klavinis believes that introducing politically charged awards into the global football system threatens the independence of the game, stressing that such initiatives must be carried out within clear institutional frameworks and free from personalisation or political agendas. She also stressed that FIFA’s credibility is linked to the extent of its commitment to the principles of transparency and governance, particularly in light of increasing international scrutiny of its decisions..

This issue is becoming increasingly sensitive as the 2026 World Cup in the United States, Canada and Mexico approaches, placing the relationship between politics and football under the microscope.

Australian footballer Jackson Irvine said football’s credibility as a force for good has been undermined by FIFA, accusing it of making a mockery of its own Human Rights Policy. Irvine took aim at FIFA’s decision to give the Peace Prize to US President Trump. “As an organisation, you would have to say decisions like the one that we saw awarding this peace prize make a mockery of what they’re trying to do with the human rights charter and trying to use football as a global driving force for good and positive change in the world,” Irvine told the Reuters news agency.

The White House has pushed back strongly against criticism of Donald Trump receiving FIFA’s inaugural Peace Prize, awarded in December for what FIFA described as “exceptional and extraordinary actions for peace.” Spokesperson Davis Ingle declared that “no one else is more deserving” and dismissed detractors as suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”

https://www.thecanary.co/global/2026/04/29/fifa-to-revoke/

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/world-cup-trump-fifa-infantino-37086100

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/insight/white-house-doubles-down-on-defence-of-trump-s-fifa-peace-prize/gm-GM2F0C30BA?gemSnapshotKey=GM2F0C30BA-snapshot-5

https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2026/4/28/before-world-cup-fifa-slammed-for-politicising-sport-with-trump-prize

and then in June 2026:

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/03/campaign-to-deliver-biggest-complaint-fifa-has-ever-received-launches-before-world-cup

and also: Fifty members of the European Parliament are demanding that FIFA investigate its president, Gianni Infantino, over alleged violations of the football federation’s own political neutrality rules.

https://www.politico.eu/article/meps-fifa-investigate-gianni-infantino-donald-trump-peace-prize

FairSquare announced a major public campaign tin July aimed at serious reform of football’s world governing body, offering the public the opportunity to add their names to an updated ethics complaint against the federation’s president.

https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/reboot-fifa-launches-class-action-against-infantino?__cf_chl_f_tk=XRT4KyKRvyAj3FKxj6FZlR7aonU78L7LXlNhHaL6zx8-1783264129-1.0.1.1-jg8DVYnMTP.P.TBDrmaxt59mcA.vUuPmRYPD9ZYdFXU

https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/07/10/771964/Rights-watchdog-files-complaint-against-FIFA-chief-for-breaching–political-neutrality–over-Trump-call

https://www.dailysabah.com/sports/football/rights-groups-slam-fifa-for-silencing-dissent-after-lamour-exit/amp

FairSquare and Human Rights Watch have filed complaints re the selection process for FIFA’s peace prize”

January 19, 2026

FIFA president Gianni Infantino presents President Donald Trump with the FIFA Peace Prize during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Final Draw at John F. Kennedy  IMAGES via Reuters Connect…Show more 

This blog has a special interest in human rights awards, so it should not fail to mention the big surprise which occurred when FIFA (Fédération Internationale de Football Association), the worldwide governing body of soccer, gave President Donald Trump its first-ever prize for global peace. An investigation by the Times of London has revealed that the White House not only knew well in advance the honor was coming but also made demands about its size and style of presentation.

There has been no transparency around FIFA’s Peace Prize process. Human Rights Watch and FairSquare have written to FIFA on 11 November 2025 to request a list of the nominees, the judges, the criteria, and the process for the Peace Prize. Human Rights Watch received no response.In his haste to ingratiate himself to Trump, Infantino neglected to inform FIFA bigwigs about the “peace prize”. That flies in the face of FIFA’s code of ethics which states that officials are expected to maintain political neutrality. [https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/media_2025/12/FIFA%20Peace%20Prize%20letter%20from%20Human%20Rights%20Watch%20.pdf]

“FIFA’s so-called peace prize is being awarded against a backdrop of violent detentions of immigrants, national guard deployments in US cities, and the obsequious cancellation of FIFA’s own anti-racism and anti-discrimination campaigns,” said Minky Worden, who oversees sport for Human Rights Watch. “There is still time to honor FIFA’s promises for a World Cup not tainted by human rights abuses, but the clock is ticking.”

Now the issue of not getting the Nobel Peace prize [see also: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2025/07/24/nobel-peace-prize-choice-between-trump-and-albanese/] became even more relevant as U.S. President Donald Trump linked his aggressive stance on Greenland to last year’s decision not to award him the Nobel Peace Prize, telling Norway’s prime minister that he no longer felt “an obligation to think purely of Peace,” two European officials said Monday.

Trump’s message to Jonas Gahr Støre appears to ratchet up a standoff between Washington and its closest allies over his threats to take over Greenland, a self-governing territory of NATO member Denmark. On Saturday, Trump announced a 10% import tax starting in February on goods from eight nations that have rallied around Denmark and Greenland, including Norway.

https://www.wsls.com/news/world/2026/01/19/trump-ties-his-stance-on-greenland-to-not-getting-nobel-peace-prize-european-officials-say/

https://eu.knoxnews.com/story/entertainment/columnists/sam-venable/2026/01/07/sam-venable-forget-fifa-if-you-want-an-award-make-it-a-fafi/87993522007/

https://www.msn.com/en-my/news/other/trump-s-fifa-peace-prize-breached-neutrality-claims-rights-group/ar-AA1S1TnG

https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/donald-trump-gianni-infantino-fifa-world-cup-bz0qhlskg

https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/12/03/world-cup-2026-fifa-needs-to-act-on-human-rights

Human Rights Defenders in Greece on trial for baseless charges for assisting people on the move; and end up being acquitted.

November 21, 2025

On 18 November 2025 Frontline published an urgent appeal that I – as a resident of Greece – with some shame share [see also: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2022/07/28/human-rights-defenders-in-greece-my-adopted-country-not-doing-well/]:

On 4 December 2025, 24 human rights defenders, including Seán Binder and Athanasios (Nassos) Karakitsos, will appear before the Mytilene Court of Appeals, on the island of Lesvos. This comes seven years (!!) after their initial arrests. The human rights defenders are facing felony charges of ‘membership of a criminal organisation’, ‘facilitation of the entry of third country nationals into the country’, and ‘money laundering’. The charges stem from work carried out by the defenders in Greece between 2016 and 2018, where they assisted people on the move whose lives were at risk while trying to reach safety to the island of Lesvos. If convicted, they face up to 20 years of imprisonment.

Seán Binder and Athanasios (Nassos) Karakitsos are migrant rights defenders who worked with Emergency Response Center International (ERCI) between 2016 and 2018. The humanitarian work carried out by ERCI was extensive, and included helping more than 1000 people reach safety, organising workshops and swimming classes for migrant children in the Kara Tepe camp, and providing residents in the Moria camp with medical assistance. ERCI was registered as a non-governmental organisation and regularly cooperated with Greek authorities, including with the Greek Coast Guard on rescue operations. The organisation was dissolved after the criminalisation of its members and volunteers.

In September 2023, the Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals’ decision, delivered on 13 January 2023, to dismiss four misdemeanour charges of ‘forgery’, ‘espionage’, ‘possession of unlicensed radio’ and ‘infringement of state secrets’ faced by Seán Binder and seven other non-Greek speaking defenders. This was due to procedural flaws, including key documents, such as the indictments, having not been translated for the accused. In January 2024, the remaining sixteen human rights defenders, including Athanasios (Nassos) Karakitsos, were acquitted of the same charges. [https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2021/11/17/greeces-mistaken-deterrence-migrants-and-aid-workers-facing-heavy-prison-sentences/]

On 21 August 2018, Lesvos Police arrested Seán Binder after he attended the police station voluntarily, having learned that another human rights defender had been arrested earlier that day. In the following days, they also arrested Athanasios (Nassos) Karakitsos, the field director of ERCI at the time. The human rights defenders were kept in pre-trial detention for more than one hundred days, accused of ‘people smuggling’, ‘money laundering’, ‘espionage’, and ‘membership of a criminal organisation.’ In December 2018, the human rights defenders were conditionally released on bail.

The upcoming trial is the second court case since 2018 initiated against the 24 human rights defenders based on their work, aiding, assisting and saving the lives of migrants and refugees, who were trapped in the Aegean Sea between Türkiye and Greece.

Front Line Defenders calls on the authorities in Greece to:

Immediately and unconditionally drop all charges against Seán Binder and Athanasios (Nassos) Karakitsos, and the other 22 human rights defenders who are also on trial;

  1. Cease the criminalisation of human rights defenders who peacefully defend the rights of the migrants and refugees, including the humanitarian assistance to save the lives of people stranded at the marine and land borders;
  2. Guarantee in all circumstances that all human rights defenders in Greece are able to carry
  3. out their legitimate human rights activities without fear of reprisals and free of all restrictions, including judicial harassment.

Download the urgent appeal

https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/case/human-rights-defenders-trial-baseless-charges-assisting-people-move

https://www.independent.ie/regionals/kerry/north-west-kerry-news/in-limbo-for-seven-years-kerry-man-sean-binder-to-face-trial-in-greece-over-humanitarian-work/a40232245.html

https://www.occrp.org/en/news/greek-court-to-hear-case-against-aid-workers-allegedly-smuggling-migrants

perhaps Tunisia can show the way: https://macaubusiness.com/tunisia-court-frees-ngo-workers-accused-of-helping-migrants

and then the good news:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/16/syrian-swimmer-sarah-mardini-cleared-by-greek-court-over-migrant-rescues

https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/01/15/humanitarians-cleared-of-bogus-charges-in-greece

https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/01/29/greek-immigration-bill-demonizes-civil-society

https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/02/06/greek-coast-guard-under-scrutiny-for-migrant-deaths

but it continue in 2026

https://euobserver.com/202747/greece-moves-to-arrest-nordic-aid-worker-supporting-migrants

and

https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/02/16/greece-continues-its-relentless-assault-on-civil-society

https://www.amnestyusa.org/press-releases/norway-release-human-rights-defender-tommy-olsen-and-reject-his-extradition-to-greece/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/20/norwegian-court-blocks-extradition-greece-tommy-olsen-migrant-rights-activist

https://impactpolicies.org/news/844/olsen-case-exposes-clash-between-refugee-pushback-secrecy-and-transparency

On 14 May 2026 AI Greece asked to Restore asylum for human rights defender: Javed Aslam. Index Number: EUR 25/1003/2026

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/07/greece-guilty-of-systematic-pushback-of-asylum-seekers-echr-rules

human rights court involving allegations of pushbacks against Greece.

Rafto Prize 2025 to Emergency Response Rooms of Sudan (ERR)

September 17, 2025

The Rafto Prize 2025 has been awarded to The Emergency Response Rooms of Sudan (ERRs) for their courageous work to preserve the most fundamental human right – the right to life.

The Emergency Response Rooms of Sudan are grassroot networks that emerged in the wake of the war in Sudan in 2023. They consist of thousands of volunteers who engage in collaborative, community driven efforts to meet urgent humanitarian needs of others, at great personal risk. The ERRs save lives and maintain human dignity in a place of misery and despair.

After the brutal war between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) broke out in April 2023, the Sudanese state collapsed. As a consequence, civilians have an enormous need for humanitarian assistance.In a desperate attempt to save lives, ordinary Sudanese took matters in their own hands and formed self-help groups to offer services supporting basic life, welfare, and human dignity through Emergency Response Rooms (ERRs).

The ERRs originated in Khartoum and has spread to other conflict areas of Sudan. To mitigate excessive loss of life and human suffering, ERRs provide key services such as health, food, water, body retrieval and burial. They also work on monitoring, documenting, and responding to cases of sexual violence.

The Rafto Prize 2025 honours the Emergency Response Rooms and the thousands of individuals protecting the right to life and health, who are building hope in Sudan, at tremendous risk to their own lives. The prize is also a recognition of the significance of grassroot mobilization and collective effort in ensuring basic human rights in times of conflict. The need for protection of human rights and humanitarian assistance is becoming greater by the day. In these trying times, we must all stand in solidarity with the people of Sudan.

For more on the Rafto prize and its many previous laureates: see: https://www.trueheroesfilms.org/thedigest/awards/A5043D5E-68F5-43DF-B84D-C9EF21976B18

https://www.rafto.no/en/news/the-rafto-prize-2025-to-emergency-response-rooms-of-sudan-err

https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/sudanese-network-volunteer-aid-groups-wins-norwegian-human-rights-award-2025-09-17/

Important Resolution on Human rights Defenders adopted by UN Human Rights Council

April 7, 2025

Led by Norway, the resolution crucially covers new grounds and further develops States’ obligations to protect human rights defenders in the digital age. It also considers the needs expressed by human rights defenders during the consultative process leading to its negotiation and approval. 

For the first time and in a major win for the human rights defenders movement, the resolution includes a reference to the Declaration +25 and is very much in line with its content. 

‘The Declaration +25 is a ground-breaking initiative,’ said Phil Lynch, Executive Director at ISHR. ‘Civil society organisations worldwide have united to produce this authoritative articulation of the international legal framework for the protection of human rights defenders. We are very pleased that the Human Rights Council recognised it,’ Lynch added.

For example, the resolution calls on States to forgo the use of biometric mass surveillance and to refrain from or cease the use or transfer of new and emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence applications and spyware to actors that are not liable to operating these in full compliance with international human rights law. 

Initially, the resolution included a reference to transnational repression but this was removed in the final version.  

‘While we welcome the reference to types of transnational repression referred to in the resolution, we stress that transnational repression is not only about actions taken by a State, but also its proxies, to deter, silence or punish people and groups who engage in dissent, critique or human rights advocacy from abroad, in relation to that State,’ said ISHR’s Lynch and civil society partners in their end of session statement. 

Indeed, transnational repression includes acts targeted directly against human rights defenders, journalists or activists, as well as acts targeting them indirectly by threatening their families, representatives or associates. Particularly vulnerable are nationals or former nationals, members of diaspora communities and those living in exile. ISHR will continue to push for States to publicly recognise and acknowledge this form of harassment. 

Another lost opportunity is the lack of explicit recognition of the positive role of child human rights defenders in promoting human rights and fostering change in societies, including their active role in the digital space. The resolution also doesn’t tackle the specific challenges and risks they face because of their age and their civic engagement, as highlighted by the Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders in her 2024 report.

The resolution fell short of reaffirming States commitments from UNGA A/RES/78/216, to enhance protection measures for child defenders and to provide a safe, enabling and empowering environment for children and young people online and offline. 

The negotiation of the resolution was a hard and long process: 12 informal sessions were needed to agree on a text. In a regrettable move, some States presented amendments to the tabled text trying to undermine and weaken it. The text was finally adopted without a vote.

OHCHR is now mandated to convene three regional workshops and a report to assess risks created by digital technologies to human rights defenders and best practices to respond to these concerns.

https://ishr.ch/latest-updates/hrc58-states-adopt-substantive-resolution-on-human-rights-defenders-emerging-technologies

https://mailchi.mp/ishr/ishr-hrc58-april-8900949?e=d1945ebb90

https://www.apc.org/en/news/digital-milestone-new-resolution-human-rights-defenders-and-new-technologies-adopted-un-human

Norway presents resolution on new technology and human rights defenders at Human Rights Council 58th Session

March 19, 2025

From press release dated: 13/03/2025

‘New technology provides human rights defenders with tools to organize, spread information, and reach people. At the same time, many experience digital surveillance, online violence, and harassment. It is important that these issues are discussed in the UN, and therefore, Norway is presenting a resolution in the UN Human Rights Council this spring’, says Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide.

The resolution emphasizes that human rights are universal and apply in the same manner online as offline.  It advocates for increased protection against digital threats and surveillance and ensures that new technology is not used to restrict freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, or the right to privacy. The resolution also highlights the need for dialogue with tech companies to discuss the challenges faced by human rights defenders in the digital space.

‘We want to gather broad support for the resolution and secure clear commitments from the international community to protect those who fight for our shared rights – also in the digital sphere’, says Eide.

Norway has a long tradition of advocating for the protection of human rights defenders. The new resolution is the result of close dialogue with civil society actors, technology experts, and other countries. The resolution will be presented and adopted at the UN this spring. Moving forward, Norway will work to gain as much international support as possible for the resolution’s important message.

https://www.norway.no/en/missions/wto-un/our-priorities/other-issues/pressreleasenorway/hrc58hrd/

Request to sign joint NGO letter for human rights defenders resolution at 58th session HRC

February 3, 2025

At the upcoming 58th session of the UN Human Rights Council, Norway will present a draft resolution on human rights defenders and new and emerging technologies.

ISHR has prepared the attached letter urging States to actively support the adoption of a resolution that recognises updated frameworks to protect human rights defenders in the digital era, addresses the growing risks of cybercrimes, online harassment, surveillance, and the suppression of free expression through censorship and disinformation. 

ISHR will be collecting NGO signatories until  7 February 2025. Please sign the letter using this link. Please feel free to circulate the link to sign on the letter to your civil society networks. We will be circulating the final version with signatories for publishing and sending it to  Geneva missions on 10 February .

Please note that  ISHR is not able to take on comments/edits on this letter. We invite interested NGOs to send their inputs directly to the drafters of the resolution – the Permanent Mission of Norway in Geneva. 

Sign the letter

Nominations for RAFTO prize 2023 now open

January 5, 2023
Call for nominations 1 1

The Rafto Prize encourages everyone with an interest in or knowledge of human rights to make a nomination. Annual deadline is 1 February. For more on this and similar awards, see: https://www.trueheroesfilms.org/thedigest/awards/A5043D5E-68F5-43DF-B84D-C9EF21976B18

Criteria

  • A candidate should be active in the struggle for the ideals and principles underlying the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  • A candidate’s struggle for human rights should represent a non-violent perspective.
  • A candidate may be a person or an organization, and two or more candidates may share the prize.

Who can nominate?

Anyone with an interest in and knowledge about human rights is welcome to nominate candidates. Candidates nominated by themselves or by their staff or by honorary officers will not be taken into consideration.

Deadline for nominations: 1 February.
Nominations received after 1 February will be taken into consideration for the Rafto Prize the following year.

Who makes the decision?

Nominations for the Rafto Prize are received and evaluated by the Prize Committee. Recipient(s) is selected by the Board of Directors.

When is the announcement the Rafto Prize?

Each year we announce the recipient of the Rafto Prize in the end of September at a press conference at the Rafto House in Bergen. The announcement is live streamed on our website and on Facebook.

For questions regarding nominations, please contact the Secretary of the Committee, Liv Unni Stuhaug, livunni.stuhaug@rafto.no

Nominate a candidate