Closing Civil Society Space – a euphemism for Killing Human Rights Defenders

November 30, 2015

The Huffington Post of 29 November 2015 carried a good piece by Brian Dooley (Human Rights First) under the title “When Closing Civil Society Space Means Killing Human Rights Defenders”. He states that “what sometimes gets overlooked in the discussion around “shrinking civil society space” are direct, violent attacks on human rights defenders.”

He refers to this year’s Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders (HRDs) which details killings of HRDs in Africa, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe and the Middle East. And a Note by the UN Secretary-General in July this year included how “defenders also describe their sense that they are often on their own, with the media showing little interest in reporting acts of aggression against them and with little support from political figures…”

Murderous attacks on HRDs are too often left out of the closing civil society discussion, sanitizing the conversation and reducing it to one about legislation and policy, Dooley says. Earlier this month, HRD NGO Front Line Defenders gathered over 160 at risk HRDs together in Dublin. Many at the Dublin Platform spoke of physical threats, including death threats, against them.

These include Juan Francisco Martinez in Honduras, Chai Bunthongiek in Thailand, Sabeen Mahmud in Pakistan, Francela Mendez in El Salvador. Three HRDs in the Philippines — Emerito Samarca, Dionel Campos, and Bello Sinzo — were murdered on the same September day. No one really knows how many HRDs are killed every year, and these figures are only a fraction of the likely number. Too many go unrecorded, unreported by the media and unpunished by governments.
…..
But HRDs remain under enormous threat. This week the UN General Assembly passed a resolution recognizing the need for the protection of HRDs. While 117 countries – including the United States — voted for the resolution, 54 refused to support it, including key U.S. military allies Bahrain, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates. Washington’s close friend Saudi Arabia actually voted against it. As did Kenya, apparently ignoring President’s Obama’s defense of civil society when in Nairobi this year. The U.S. government needs to push its allies to end impunity for those who attack or murder human rights defenders, and ensure that its own discussions about closing civil society space are always open to include the killings of HRDs. [see also: https://thoolen.wordpress.com/tag/un-resolution/]

For the full piece: When Closing Civil Society Space Means Killing Human Rights Defenders | Brian Dooley

One Response to “Closing Civil Society Space – a euphemism for Killing Human Rights Defenders”


  1. […] 30 November I referred to the systematic killing of human rights defenders in 2015 [https://thoolen.wordpress.com/2015/11/30/closing-civil-society-space-a-euphemism-for-killing-human-r…] and mentioned the annual report by Front Line for 2015 listing Latin America and the Philippines […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s