Posts Tagged ‘international community’

NGOs in China and Europe, just published, contains fascinating information

March 8, 2011

One should be careful praising books to which one has contributed oneself. But I make an exception for this volume which makes a comparison of the experiences of NGOs in China and Europe. The chapters on China contain the most comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of various types of NGOs currently active in the country. The contributions on foreign NGOs in China, non-governmental think tanks, public interest legal organizations, labour related NGOs and charity organizations, are the first in English to discuss successful experiences as well as the difficulties they face in the post-Mao era. They show that the Chinese government does not know on which foot to dance. It wants a flourishing civil society (without which social and economic growth cannot be sustained) but also wants to continue to exercise full control over developments less ‘harmony’ is threatened.  This applies specially to NGO work in the sensitive human rights sector.

The European studies draw examples from countries where the experiences of NGOs are at various stages of development. The section on NGOs in Central and Eastern Europe examines the rapid expansion of civil society and their pivotal role in promoting political change and building democracy in a transitional society, as well as the challenges they confront in advancing a strong civil society. Those chapters on NGOs’ experiences in Western European countries, especially in the Netherlands and the UK, provide insightful information and examination of the most contentious issues about NGOs’ accountability, fundraising, governance and relationship with their governments.

Contents: Introduction: challenges and opportunities for NGOs in different parts of the world, Yuwen Li; Part I NGOs in the Context of China: International NGOs in China: current situation, impacts and response of the Chinese Government, Han Junkui; The development and institutional environment of non-governmental think tanks in China, Jia Xijin; Development of charities in China since the reform and opening up, Liu Peifeng; The development of women’s NGOs in China, Shen Guoqin; Public interest legal organizations in China: current situation and prospect for future development, Xie Haiding; A review of the development of labour organizations in China in the 30 years since the reform and opening up, Zhou Shaoqing. Part II Civil Society Organizations in Europe: The voluntary sector and government: perspectives from the UK, Liz Atkins; Creating an enabling environment for NGOs in Central and Eastern Europe, Nilda Bullain; Socially responsible NGOs? A European perspective, Paul Dekker; The role and organization of voluntary action, Richard Fries; Oversight on fundraising by NPOs: Dutch experiences with a European perspective, Adri Kemps; Civil society in the Czech Republic, Petr Jan Pajas; Learning for a lifetime: NGOs, capacity building and nonprofit education in Eastern Europe, Balazs Sator.

My own contribution: ” The international human rights movement: not perfect, but a lot better than many governments think” traces the development of the international human rights movement of the last 60 years and zooms in on those aspects that are the most often misunderstood – or found objectionable – by authoritarian states.

The editor is Yuwen Li, Associate Professor of Chinese Law at the Erasmus University Rotterdam. The publisher is Ashgate, 340 pages, ISBN: 978-1-4094-1959-4 (ebook, ISBN 978-1-4094-1960-0)

 

The enforcement gap: what human rights NGOs should concentrate on in the next few years

April 28, 2010

In many ways human rights has been an enormous success story. In about half a century, it has gone from a relatively minor issue in diplomatic relations to a major and ongoing international concern, with elaborate treaties, mechanisms and codes. Specialized human rights organizations have among them millions of active members. The weakness remains enforcement, even in cases where the binding legal character of the rules is not in doubt.

This non-enforcement is of such a blatant character that there is a serious risk that many of the gains described above will be lost. Only half-jokingly the best advice one can give a tyrannical regime is to simply ignore all international condemnations, refuse to answer any queries, do not let any UN Rapporteurs or NGOs in, and after a while – usually quite quickly – the furor, if any, will dampen and the media will shine their light elsewhere, most likely where there is some degree of cooperation and access. This does not encourage States to follow human rights norms!

An example from the category of treaty obligations where a country has formally pledged to honor its obligations (Communication no 1150/2033 Uteeva vs Uzbekistan):. When the sister of a man condemned to death complained that the confession was obtained under torture, the Human Rights Committee requested Uzbekistan not to carry out the execution  while the case was under consideration. Six months later the Uzbek Government informed the Committee that the death sentence had been carried out.

Several countries have steadily refused to cooperate with the UN Human Rights Council and do not let Rapporteurs in (e,g, Iran, Cuba, Burma). Even more refuse to let NGOs in.

In the area of business and human rights in 2008 over 3.000 companies had signed up to the Global Compact (a voluntary code to uphold basic standards – no real teeth, but striking off the list is possible). In 2006, 335 companies were struck off the list, but who knows?

Rather than speculate about why most human rights bodies and persons seem to accept this state of affairs (fatigue, not interesting for the media, not attractive for donors, etc), we should devise urgently mechanism to remedy this situation, to make sure that “crime does not pay”.

Some ideas:

  • Every year on 10 December, Human Rights Day, the human rights movement – through a coalition of major and representative NGOs – makes public a list of the top 10 ‘refusniks’ (countries that stand out in ‘non-cooperation’)
  • Non-enforcement of decisions by any of the UN treaty bodies will have to be strengthened (report to the General Assembly is not enough). The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights could be asked to compile annually a list of non-enforced decisions and give it the widest possible dissemination, including to the meetings of the States Parties. Persistent non-compliance should be routinely followed by inter-state complaints.
  • A business company struck of the list of the Global Compact MUST make this known in the same media and publications in which its joining was announced and with same emphasis (this should be made this part of the code). Non-compliance with this requirement should lead to an active campaign by the UN to explain why the company was struck off the list.

 Reactions and other ideas are most welcome.

Ash cloud forces Human Rights Defenders on-line

April 19, 2010

The True Heroes ‘International Conference on Human Rights and the new Media’ was meticulously planned for 6 months, to be held on 19-20 April in The Hague. Then the ash cloud came and flights to the Netherlands became almost impossible. As a result 25 human rights defenders could not reach their conference and risked to be robbed of the chance to learn more about how to use images and new media to better protect human rights in their own countries.

However, the new media specialists involved in the conference decided to turn the difficulties into an opportunity: to show the world that with NEW MEDIA we can still connect and communicate, exactly what the conference aimed to achieve. So the programme is being adjusted in a
‘2.0’ way, with live-streams, a forum on www.media4heroes.com, etc.

The programme on Monday morning remains unchanged with the participation of Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs Verhagen, SMS action by Amnesty International for Emad Baghi, round-table discussions and a soapbox debate in Zeebelt Theatre, The Hague. The programme of the conference can be found on the website.

more on what this blog will be about

March 15, 2010

I do not intend to duplicate the excellent work being done by a variety of organisations for the benefit of individual human rights defenders such as,  just to mention a few: Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Observatory for Human Rights Defenders (run by FIDH and OMCT), Human Rights First or Frontline).  If there is something urgent in an individual case of a Human Rights Defender (HRD) in distress, I would obviously pass it on. I will also not hesitate to refer to a particularly significant initiative or action by any NGO or IGO. But the main purpose of the blog is to reflect on the problems of human rights defenders in general and the response by the international community to their needs. Questions such as:

– is there a proper and operational definition of who is a HRD? 

– does publicity (e.g. from awards) help or hinder HRDs?;

– does the totality of support efforts cover adequately the rea needs of HRDs?;

– to what extent is the ‘competition’ between NGOs with mandates for the protection of HRDs more harmful than helpful?;  

– are the new information technologies and media sufficiently used by HRDs (and if not why and how could it be changed)?

– and of course any other such issues that come my way thanks to the responses to this post,

a bit clearer now why I started this blog effort? best regards

Hans Thoolen